Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 530 (2026)

Motor vehicle licenses; classes; qualifications

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1977, c. 692, §3 (NEW). PL 1977, c. 696, §214 (NEW). PL 1979, c. 127, §166 (RP). PL 1979, c. 527 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 52, §1 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 539, §4 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 415, §§18,19 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 71, §2 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 514, §§4-8,25 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 822, §1 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 388, §5 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 597, §§14,15 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 758, §9 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 417, §1 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 658, §10 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 683, §A1 (RP). PL 1993, c. 683, §B5 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1979–1994 · leading case: State v. Dube, 409 A.2d 1102 (Me. 1979).
State v. Dube, 409 A.2d 1102 (Me. 1979). · cites it 2× “In support of that argument, he contends that 29 M.R.S.A. § 530 (Supp.1979-80) constitutes a "specific finding" by the Legislature that any holder of a Class 1 operator's license is qualified to drive a tractor trailer and that nothing in the statutes authorizes the Public…”
Jackson v. State, 544 A.2d 291 (Me. 1988). “As required by 29 M.R.S.A. § 530(2)(C) (Supp.1987) and 29 M.”
State v. Landry, 428 A.2d 1204 (Me. 1981). “1980), and of operating beyond license restriction, 29 M.R.S.A. § 530(1)(B) (Supp.1980). On his appeal Landry attacks both convictions, claiming that (1) the Superior Court should have granted his motion to dismiss the first charge because the police unjustifiably refused his…”
State v. LaPlante, 534 A.2d 959 (Me. 1987). “Driving without a valid driver’s license, 29 M.R.S.A. § 530 (Supp.1987) and using improper *963 license plates, 29 M.”
Allen v. Hunter, 505 A.2d 486 (Me. 1986). “29 M.R.S.A. § 530 (Supp. 1985-1986). 2 . Title 14 M.”
State v. Thayer, 539 A.2d 206 (Me. 1988). “Robert Thayer appeals from a conviction of operating a motor vehicle without a license (29 M.R.S.A. § 530 (Supp.1987)) following a jury trial in the Superior Court (Franklin County).”
State v. Jamieson, 643 A.2d 380 (Me. 1994). “1993), 1 should be vacated because it is irreconcilable with the jury’s verdict finding him not guilty on the charge of operating a motor vehicle in violation of his license restriction, 29 M.R.S.A. § 530(1)(B) (Pamph.1993). 2 We affirm the judgment.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 530(1)(B) — 2 cases
State v. Landry, 428 A.2d 1204 (Me. 1981). “1980), and of operating beyond license restriction, 29 M.R.S.A. § 530(1)(B) (Supp.1980). On his appeal Landry attacks both convictions, claiming that (1) the Superior Court should have granted his motion to dismiss the first charge because the police unjustifiably refused his…”
State v. Jamieson, 643 A.2d 380 (Me. 1994). “1993), 1 should be vacated because it is irreconcilable with the jury’s verdict finding him not guilty on the charge of operating a motor vehicle in violation of his license restriction, 29 M.R.S.A. § 530(1)(B) (Pamph.1993). 2 We affirm the judgment.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 530(2)(C) — 1 case
Jackson v. State, 544 A.2d 291 (Me. 1988). “As required by 29 M.R.S.A. § 530(2)(C) (Supp.1987) and 29 M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.