Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 30
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 30, § 2155 (2026)

Proof of ordinances

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1987, c. 737, §§A1,C106 (RP). PL 1989, c. 6 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 9, §2 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 104, §§C8,C10 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1971–1974 · leading case: Packard v. Whitten, 274 A.2d 169 (Me. 1971).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Packard v. Whitten, 274 A.2d 169 (Me. 1971). “30 M.R.S.A. § 2155. The jury could have concluded from the ensuing testimony that the Defendant Coca-Cola’s truck had been left standing within 25 feet of the intersection and that its position there at that time obstructing the views of Mrs.”
City of Saco v. Tweedie, 314 A.2d 135 (Me. 1974). “Under those circumstances we are not concerned with whether the ordinance was proved in accordance with 30 M.R.S.A. § 2155, 1 since the original records were properly before the Court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.