Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 30
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 30, § 951 (2026)

Deputies; appointments and removal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 379 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 213 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 114, §33 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 431, §4 (RPR). PL 1977, c. 650, §4 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 394, §4 (RPR). PL 1985, c. 261 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 374 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 737, §§A1,C106 (RP). PL 1989, c. 6 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 9, §2 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 104, §§C8,C10 (AMD).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1982–1987 · leading case: Colby v. York Cnty. Commissioners, 442 A.2d 544 (Me. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Colby v. York Cnty. Commissioners, 442 A.2d 544 (Me. 1982). · cites it 5× “Asserting that his dismissal was without cause, plaintiff sought an investigation by the York County Commissioners, pursuant to 30 M.R.S.A. § 951 (1978). 1 Plaintiff alleges that the investigation was held in executive session notwithstanding his request in writing that the…”
Durrell v. Franklin Cnty. Commissioners, 532 A.2d 146 (Me. 1987). · cites it 2× “There is no question that the sheriff’s appointments and dismissals of deputy sheriffs are subject to the approval of the county commissioners under 30 M.R.S.A. §§ 951, 64-A(l), 4 and 64-A(3).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.