Maine Revised Statutes
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 1081 (2026)
Definitions; persons excepted
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1967, c. 544, §80 (NEW). PL 1971, c. 159, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 484, §§3-5 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 440, §3 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 331, §1 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 378, §§8-10 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 402, §A167 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 600, §A63 (AMD). RR 2001, c. 2, §C6 (COR). RR 2001, c. 2, §C7 (AFF). PL 2001, c. 337, §2 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 344, §D21 (AMD). PL 2007, c. 210, §2 (AMD). PL 2007, c. 620, Pt. C, §§2-6 (AMD). PL 2011, c. 184, §3 (AMD). PL 2015, c. 155, §§1-4 (AMD). PL 2015, c. 429, §17 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1978–1979 · leading case: State v. Hussey, 381 A.2d 665 (Me. 1978).
State v. Hussey, 381 A.2d 665 (Me. 1978). “The definition of practicing dentistry is found in 32 M.R.S.A. § 1081 (1973 Supp.), which provides in pertinent part: Any person shall be deemed to be practicing dentistry .”
Mitchell v. Mitchell, 403 A.2d 1214 (Me. 1979). “§ 1081 (1978)), 3 reveal that orthodontal care is generally considered a part of *1217 dental care, and that the expense of such care is to be borne by the parent responsible for a child’s “reasonable medical, dental and hospital expenses.” We now so decide. Turning to the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.