Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 33
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 33, § 1024 (2026)

Other common law and statutory causes of action and relief still available

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Nothing in this chapter may be construed to abrogate any other causes of action or relief at law or equity to which elderly dependent persons are entitled under other laws or at common law.   [PL 1987, c. 699, §1 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1987, c. 699, §1 (NEW).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1995–2016 · leading case: Lois Young v. Joseph Lagasse, 2016 ME 96, 143 A.3d 131.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lois Young v. Joseph Lagasse, 2016 ME 96, 143 A.3d 131. “Common law undue influence actions are not abrogated by the Act, see 33 M.R.S. § 1024 (2015), but Young did not plead common law undue influence or raise this theory before the trial court.”
Bragdon v. Drew, 658 A.2d 666 (Me. 1995). “” 33 M.R.S.A. § 1024 (Supp.1994) provides: "Nothing in this chapter may be construed to abrogate any other causes of action or relief at law or equity to which elderly dependent persons are entitled under other laws or at common law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.