Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 34
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 34, § 807 (2026)

Escapes, apprehension, assaults

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1967, c. 391, §13 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 346, §5 (RPR). PL 1969, c. 541 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 492, §6 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 499, §66 (RP). PL 1975, c. 756, §19 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1969–2009 · leading case: Fuller v. State, 282 A.2d 848 (Me. 1971).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fuller v. State, 282 A.2d 848 (Me. 1971). · cites it 18× “He maintains that 34 M.R.S.A. § 807, 1 which is specifically concerned with *851 the criminality, as well as other aspects, of an assault and battery upon a guard, and committed by an inmate, of the Men’s Correctional Center, excludes the applicability of 17 M.”
Chapman v. State, 250 A.2d 696 (Me. 1969). “Section 1405 or 34 M.R.S.A. Section 807 no prejudice resulted.”
State v. Stewart, 330 A.2d 800 (Me. 1975). “Not unexpectedly, escapes by persons not actually under physical restraint became more common than were escapes from inside the prison’s walls or when prisoners were closely guarded outside the walls.”
Scribner's Mill Pres. v. Maine Dep't of Envtl. Prot., No. CUMap-09-016 (Me. Super. Ct Sept. 9, 2009). “Section 11002(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act provides: " [t]he petition for review shall be filed within 30 days after receipt of notice if taken by a party 34 M.R.S. § 807 states the prohibition against and the exceptions to the unauthorized practice of law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.