Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 36
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 36, § 571 (2026)

Title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
This subchapter may be cited as the "Maine Tree Growth Tax Law."   [PL 1971, c. 616, §8 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1971, c. 616, §8 (NEW).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1994–2017 · leading case: Sanseverino v. Gregor, 2011 ME 8 (Me. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sanseverino v. Gregor, 2011 ME 8 (Me. 2011). · cites it 3× “See 36 M.R.S. §§ 571 to 584-A (2010). 2 The deed to each of the MLP properties contains the following restrictive covenant: “The lot shall be used only for single-family residential purposes and no commercial or business activity shall be conducted on the lot.”
Francis Small Heritage Trust, Inc. v. Town of Limington, 2014 ME 102 (Me. 2014). “Three of the parcels have historically been taxed pursuant to the Maine Tree Growth Tax Law, 36 M.R.S. §§ 571 to 584-A (2013). 2 The remaining eight parcels are classified as open space land pursuant to the Farm and Open Space Tax Law, 36 M.”
Dubois v. City of Saco, 645 A.2d 1125 (Me. 1994). “The Duboises contend that the trial court erred in determining that the penalty imposed by the City pursuant to the Tree Growth Tax Law, 36 M.R.S.A. §§ 571 to 584-A (1990 & Supp.”
Mcbreairty v. Com'r of Admin. & Fin. Serv., 663 A.2d 50 (Me. 1995). “Tree Growth Tax Reimbursement The plaintiffs also contend that section 578 of the Tree Growth Tax Law, 36 M.R.S.A. §§ 571 to 584-A (1990 & Supp.”
McBreairty v. Comm'r of Admin. & Fin. Servs., 663 A.2d 50 (Me. 1995). “Tree Growth Tax Reimbursement The plaintiffs also contend that section 578 of the Tree Growth Tax Law, 36 M.R.S.A. §§ 571 to 584-A (1990 & Supp.”
Tyvoll v. Hughes (Me. Super. Ct 2017). “In further argument of their position, the plaintiffs assert that each and every resident in the subdivision has placed their forest land under the Tree Growth Tax 3 Law as found in 36 M.R.S. § 571 et seq. ("Tree Growth"). They argue the Private Way statute does not authorize…”
Roux v. Gammon (Me. Super. Ct 2011). “) As of the date of conveyance, the 170-acre parcel of land was taxed as forest land by the City of Auburn pursuant to the Maine Tree Growth Tax 1 Law, 36 M.R.S. § 571, et seq.1 (Def.'s S.M.F. ]I 2.”
Francis Small Heritage Trust, Inc. v. The Town of Limington (Me. Super. Ct 2013). “§1108 and tree growth properties, 36 M.R.S. §§571 - et seq. These are just some of the many examples.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.