Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 39
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 21-A (2026)

Liability of employer

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1985, c. 249, §4 (NEW). PL 1987, c. 77, §3 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 861, §28 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 615, §A22 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 824, §B12 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 885, §A7 (RP). PL 1991, c. 885, §§A9-11 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1985–1998 · leading case: Beverage v. Cumberland Farms N., Inc., 502 A.2d 486 (Me. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Beverage v. Cumberland Farms N., Inc., 502 A.2d 486 (Me. 1985). “See 39 M.R.S.A. §§ 21-A to 27 (1978 & Pamph. 1985-1986).”
Lavoie v. Gervais, 1998 ME 158, 713 A.2d 335. “1997) (replacing 39 M.R.S.A. § 21-A(1)(C) (1989)). Consequently, Aurel was denied any recovery under the Workers’ Compensation Act.”
Priestman v. Canadian Pac. Ltd., 782 F. Supp. 681 (D. Me. 1992). “39 M.R.S.A. § 21-A. Defendant does not deny that it did not secure compensation insurance for the Plaintiff.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 21-A(1)(C): 1 case
Lavoie v. Gervais, 1998 ME 158, 713 A.2d 335. “1997) (replacing 39 M.R.S.A. § 21-A(1)(C) (1989)). Consequently, Aurel was denied any recovery under the Workers’ Compensation Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.