Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 39
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 21 (2026)

Liability of employer

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 411, §2 (AMD). PL 1965, c. 489, §2 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 459, §2 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 576, §3 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 746, §5 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 376 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 749, §4 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 70, §3 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 249, §3 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1976–1988 · leading case: Procise v. Elec. Mut. Liab. Ins., 494 A.2d 1375 (Me. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Procise v. Elec. Mut. Liab. Ins., 494 A.2d 1375 (Me. 1985). “39 M.R.S.A. § 21 (1978). The Act does not state any requirements that co-employees must fulfill regarding the payment of benefits.”
Philbrook v. Gates Formed-Fibre Prods., Inc., 536 A.2d 1118 (Me. 1988). “[[Image here]] At the time of Philbrook's injury, 39 M.R.S.A. § 21(1), as amended by P.L.1981 ch.”
Levesque v. Levesque, 363 A.2d 951 (Me. 1976). “As of the date of the appellant’s injury, the first paragraph of 39 M.R.S.A. § 21 (as amended 1965) read as follows: “Every private employer subject to this Act, who has secured the payment of compensation in conformity with sections 21 to 27 shall be conclusively presumed to be…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 21(1) — 1 case
Philbrook v. Gates Formed-Fibre Prods., Inc., 536 A.2d 1118 (Me. 1988). “[[Image here]] At the time of Philbrook's injury, 39 M.R.S.A. § 21(1), as amended by P.L.1981 ch.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.