Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 39
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 58-A (2026)

Death benefits; apportionment

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1985, c. 372, §A25 (NEW). PL 1985, c. 601, §3 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 560, §5 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 861, §30 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 885, §A7 (RP). PL 1991, c. 885, §§A9-11 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1991–2000 · leading case: Marchand v. E. Welding Co., 641 A.2d 190 (Me. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marchand v. E. Welding Co., 641 A.2d 190 (Me. 1994). “See 39 M.R.S.A. § 58-A (1987), repealed by P.”
Cribben v. Cent. Maine Home Improvements, 754 A.2d 350 (Me. 2000). · cites it 5× “[¶ 1] The employer, Central Maine Home Improvements (CMHI), appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board that the employee’s child, born two years after the 1990 injury, but prior to the employee’s death in 1996, may be treated as a dependent for purposes of…”
Violette v. Leo Violette & Sons, Inc., 597 A.2d 1356 (Me. 1991). “The employer commenced paying weekly death benefits to employee’s dependents pursuant to 39 M.R.S.A. § 58-A (1989). The widow, relying on the period of time between the date of injury and date of death, filed a petition for permanent impairment benefits.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 58-A(2) — 1 case
Cribben v. Cent. Maine Home Improvements, 754 A.2d 350 (Me. 2000). “[¶ 1] The employer, Central Maine Home Improvements (CMHI), appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board that the employee’s child, born two years after the 1990 injury, but prior to the employee’s death in 1996, may be treated as a dependent for purposes of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.