Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 5
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 1095 (2026)

Employees' contributions

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 288, §1 (AMD). PL 1965, c. 337, §3 (AMD). PL 1965, c. 445, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1967, c. 143, §1 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 415, §§4,4-A (AMD). PL 1971, c. 39 (AMD). P&SL 1971, c. 179, §E3 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 482, §1 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 513, §1 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 622, §10 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 412, §2 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 513, §22 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 542, §§1-3 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 625, §§24,25 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 497, §3 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 622, §§38-B (RPR). PL 1977, c. 661, §1 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 453, §2 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 751, §§1-4 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 801, §§2,7 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1990–2012 · leading case: Wong v. Hawk, 2012 ME 125, 55 A.3d 425.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wong v. Hawk, 2012 ME 125, 55 A.3d 425. · cites it 2× “1990) (addressing benefits affected by 5 M.R.S.A. §§ 1095, 1122 (1979)). 1 In contrast, disability benefits generally constitute compensation for a personal injury that impairs earning capacity.”
Dishon v. Maine State Ret. Sys., 569 A.2d 1216 (Me. 1990). · cites it 2× “See 5 M.R.S.A. § 1122(5-A) (1979). An injured worker who qualifies for ordinary state retirement benefits from the System instead of disability retirement benefits would suffer no such reduction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.