Mass. Gen. Laws » Part I Title XV Chapter 108A
Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 108A, § 30 (2026)

Effect of dissolution

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 30. On dissolution the partnership is not terminated, but continues until the winding up of partnership affairs is completed.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1989–2019 · leading case: Chang v. Winklevoss, 123 N.E.3d 204 (Mass. App. Ct. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Chang v. Winklevoss, 123 N.E.3d 204 (Mass. App. Ct. 2019). “" We discern no error in the judge's reasoning. Chang contends that the judge erred by failing to apply the Massachusetts Uniform Partnership Act, G.”
Anastos v. Sable, 819 N.E.2d 587 (Mass. 2004). “G. L. c. 108A, § 30. “Winding up” is similarly a term of art under the Uniform Partnership Act, although it is not defined in the statute itself.”
Normandin v. Normandin (In Re Normandin), 106 B.R. 14 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1989). “The business of the partnership is also frequently the means by which the partners earn a livelihood.”
Diranian v. Diranian, 773 N.E.2d 462 (Mass. App. Ct. 2002). “” G. L. c. 108A, § 30. “On the death of a partner his right in specific partnership property vests in the surviving partner .”
DiCarlo v. Lattuca, 802 N.E.2d 121 (Mass. App. Ct. 2004). “” G. L. c. 108A, § 30. Until partnership affairs are wound up and a distribution is made, the deceased’s partner’s right in partnership property “vests in the surviving partner .”
Nickless v. Aaronson (In re Katz), 341 B.R. 123 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2006). “G.L. c. 108A, § 30. “Winding up” is similarly a term of art under the Uniform Partnership Act, although it is not defined in the statute itself.”
Cheswell, Inc. v. Premier Homes & Land Corp., 326 F. Supp. 2d 201 (D. Mass. 2004). “” Mass. Gen. L. ch. 108A, § 30. Ward himself asserts that if the assignment in question occurred as of January 30, 2002, which it did, it should be considered part of the “winding up” process.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.