Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 112, § 74D (2026)

Contracts or agreements; restrictive covenants on nurses or practical nurses void

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 74D. Any contract or agreement which creates or establishes the terms of a partnership, employment, or any other form of professional relationship with a nurse registered to practice as a registered nurse pursuant to section seventy-four, or a practical nurse registered to practice as a licensed practical nurse pursuant to section seventy-four A, which includes any restriction of the right of such nurse to practice as a nurse in any geographical area for any period of time after the termination of such partnership, employment or professional relationship shall be void and unenforceable with respect to said restriction. Nothing in this section shall render void or unenforceable any other provision of any such contract or agreement.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2023 · leading case: 178 Lowell Street Operating Co. v. Nichols, 152 F. Supp. 3d 47 (D. Mass. 2016).
178 Lowell Street Operating Co. v. Nichols, 152 F. Supp. 3d 47 (D. Mass. 2016). “Defendants respond that the non-solicitation provision is unenforceable because M.G.L. c. 112, § 74D prohibits employers from imposing contractual covenants that restrict the right of a nurse, such as Nichols, to practice as a nurse in any geographical area for any period of…”
Ascend Learning, LLC v. Bryan, No. 1:22-cv-11978 (D. Mass. Aug. 16, 2023). · cites it 2× “112, § 74D Defendants also argue that the “non-compete provisions” of the 2011 Agreement, and presumably similar provisions in the Harris Agreement, are invalid and unenforceable because they restrict the practice of nursing, which is prohibited by Mass. Gen. Laws. ch. 112, §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.