Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 123, § 13 (2026)

Transfer of dangerous males to Bridgewater state hospital; retention period; further commitment; procedure

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 13. If the superintendent of any facility determines that failure to retain a male resident therein in strict security would create a likelihood of serious harm by reason of mental illness and that the person's violent behavior constitutes an emergency, he may, with the consent of the commissioner, transfer the person to the Bridgewater state hospital for a period not to exceed five days. At the end of the five days the person shall be returned to the facility unless before the end of the five day period, the superintendent of the facility or medical director of the Bridgewater state hospital has filed a petition for his commitment to the Bridgewater state hospital under sections seven and eight. Such commitment shall not be ordered without a hearing. Such petition shall be brought in the district court of Brockton unless already filed in some other court before the emergency transfer.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2023 · leading case: Kenney, 850 N.E.2d 590 (Mass. App. Ct. 2006).
Kenney, 850 N.E.2d 590 (Mass. App. Ct. 2006). “at 530 (G. L. c. 123, § 13[o], mandates commitment); Commonwealth v.”
Doe ex rel. Roe v. Gaughan, 617 F. Supp. 1477 (D. Mass. 1985). “Pursuant to M.G.L. c. 123 § 13, men held in a facility operated by the Department of Mental Health may be transferred to Bridgewater for up to five days in an emergency situation.”
George MacKie v. Robert Joss., No. 22-P-0450 (Mass. App. Ct. July 31, 2023). “The department of correction chose Joss as one of the two QEs under G. L. c. 123, § 13 (a), to examine Mackie, and to file the report required by statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.