Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 123, § 36A (2026)

Court records of examination or commitment; privacy

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 36A. All reports of examinations made to a court pursuant to sections one to eighteen, inclusive, section forty-seven and forty-eight shall be private except in the discretion of the court. All petitions for commitment, notices, orders of commitment and other commitment papers used in proceedings under sections one to eighteen and section thirty-five shall be private except in the discretion of the court. Each court shall keep a private docket of the cases of persons coming before it believed to be mentally ill, including proceedings under section thirty-five; provided that nothing in this section shall prevent public inspection of any complaints or indictments in a criminal case, or prevent any notation in the ordinary docket of criminal cases concerning commitment proceedings under sections one to eighteen against a defendant in a criminal case. Notwithstanding the provisions of this paragraph, any person who is the subject of an examination or a commitment proceeding, or his counsel, may inspect all reports and papers filed with the court in a pending proceeding, and the prosecutor in a criminal case may inspect all reports and papers concerning commitment proceedings that are filed with the court in a pending case.

Notwithstanding this section, a court shall, pursuant to section 35 and section 36C, transmit information contained in court records to the department of criminal justice information services, which shall provide the information to: (i) licensing authorities as defined under section 121 of chapter 140; provided, however, that information shared under this clause shall be information required or permitted to be considered under state or federal law to conduct background checks for firearm sales or licensing; and (ii) the Federal Bureau of Investigation; provided, however, that the information shared under this clause shall be information required or permitted under federal law to be included in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System maintained to conduct background checks for firearms sales or licensing; provided further, that the court shall not transmit information solely because a person seeks voluntary treatment or is involuntarily hospitalized for assessment or evaluation. Information transmitted to the department of criminal justice information services pursuant to this section and said sections 35 and 36C shall not be considered public records pursuant to section 10 of chapter 66 and clause Twenty-sixth of section 7 of chapter 4. If the information required to be transmitted under clause (i) of this paragraph relates to a person who currently holds a license, card or permit issued under sections 122, 122B, 129B, 131 or 131F of chapter 140, such information shall be disseminated automatically to the relevant licensing authority through the Criminal Justice Information System for each commitment that is ordered as soon as the information is available.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1990–2025 · leading case: Borucki v. Ryan, 555 N.E.2d 212 (Mass. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Borucki v. Ryan, 555 N.E.2d 212 (Mass. 1990). · cites it 3× “The sole issue before us is whether G. L. c. 123, § 36A, 1 creates a private right of action.”
Kirk v. Commonwealth, 944 N.E.2d 135 (Mass. 2011). “To support her argument that the presumption of openness has been overcome in this case, the plaintiff cites a number of statutes, the first of which is G. L. c. 123, § 36A. 10 That statute provides for the privacy of certain reports of examinations and commitment-related…”
Commonwealth v. Elena Kurbatzky. (Mass. App. Ct. 2025). “See G. L. c. 123, § 36A ("all reports of examinations made to a court pursuant to [G.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.