Section 6. (a) When the law of this commonwealth authorizes service outside this commonwealth, the service, when reasonably calculated to give actual notice, may be made:
(1) by personal delivery in the manner prescribed for service within this commonwealth;
(2) in the manner prescribed by the law of the place in which the service is made for service in that place in an action in any of its courts of general jurisdiction;
(3) by any form of mail addressed to the person to be served and requiring a signed receipt;
(4) as directed by the foreign authority in response to a letter rogatory; or
(5) as directed by the court.
(b) Proof of service outside this commonwealth may be made by affidavit of the individual who made the service or in the manner prescribed by the law of this commonwealth, the order pursuant to which the service is made, or the law of the place in which the service is made for proof of service in an action in any of its courts of general jurisdiction. When service is made by mail, proof of service shall include a receipt signed by the addressee or other evidence of personal delivery to the addressee satisfactory to the court.
Droukas v. Divers Training Academy, Inc., 376 N.E.2d 548 (Mass. 1978). “Service of process was made on the defendant in Florida by certified mail, return receipt requested, in accordance with G. L. c. 223A, § 6 (a) (3). The defendant filed a motion to dismiss the action for lack of “personal jurisdiction” over it within the meaning of the statute.”
Walsh v. Ogorzalek, 361 N.E.2d 1247 (Mass. 1977). · cites it 2ד90, § 3A, and G. L. c. 223A, § 6) may modify the application of an earlier statute in the new circumstances.”
Carlson Corp. v. Univ. of Vermont, 402 N.E.2d 483 (Mass. 1980). “The university was served by certified mail pursuant to the Massachusetts long-arm statute, G. L. c. 223A, § 6, and moved to dismiss pursuant to Mass.”
Commonwealth v. Beneficial Fin. Co., 275 N.E.2d 33 (Mass. 1971). “See G. L. c. 223A, § 6. 10 This was replaced the next day by a “Substitute Motion to Dismiss.”
Moore v. Moore, 448 N.E.2d 1255 (Mass. 1983). “Service of process on the husband was made under the long-arm statute, G. L. c. 223A, § 6, and a default was entered on May 7, 1980, for *23 his failure to answer the complaint.”
Christian Book Distributors, Inc. v. Wallace, 760 N.E.2d 735 (Mass. App. Ct. 2001). “” G. L. c. 223A, § 6(a)(1). Rule 4(d) of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure in turn provides that “personal service” upon an individual within the Commonwealth may be made “by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to him personally; or by leaving copies…”
Roy v. Roy, 715 N.E.2d 70 (Mass. App. Ct. 1999). · cites it 2דFor purposes of decision we assume that the certified mail receipt signed by Mueller’s wife in Florida constituted “other evidence of personal delivery to the addressee satisfactory to the court,” G. L. c. 223A, § 6(6), so as to establish service of process under G.”
Gill v. Flynn, 1997 Mass. App. Div. 138 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div. 1997). · cites it 2דSuch affidavit establishes that service by delivering process to the defendants’ last and usual abode was not perfected in compliance with G.L.c. 223A, §6(1) and Mass. R Civ. P., Rule 4(d) (1).”
Kagan v. United Vacuum Appliance Corp., 260 N.E.2d 208 (Mass. 1970). “(3) by any form of mail addressed to the person to be served and requiring a signed receipt .”
Stanley Works v. Globemaster, Inc., 400 F. Supp. 1325 (D. Mass. 1975). “Therefore, service of the individual defendants “by any form of mail addressed to the person to be served and requiring a signed receipt” under Mass.Gen.Laws ch. 223A, § 6(a)(3) is sufficient.”
Polaroid Corp. v. Feely, 889 F. Supp. 21 (D. Mass. 1995). “4(e)(3); Mass.Gen.Laws Ann. ch. 223A, § 6(b) (1985) (service may be made by mail addressed to the person and requiring a signed receipt); see also United States v.”
Palandjian v. Pahlavi, 586 F. Supp. 671 (D. Mass. 1984). “M.G.L. c. 223A, § 6 a, provides, in relevant part: *676 (a) When the law of this commonwealth authorizes service outside this commonwealth, the service, when reasonably calculated to give actual notice, may be made: (2) in the manner prescribed by the law of the place in which…”
Gill v. Flynn, 1997 Mass. App. Div. 138 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div. 1997). “Such affidavit establishes that service by delivering process to the defendants’ last and usual abode was not perfected in compliance with G.L.c. 223A, §6(1) and Mass. R Civ. P., Rule 4(d) (1).”
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 223A, § 6(3) — 1 case
Gill v. Flynn, 1997 Mass. App. Div. 138 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div. 1997). “Such affidavit establishes that service by delivering process to the defendants’ last and usual abode was not perfected in compliance with G.L.c. 223A, §6(1) and Mass. R Civ. P., Rule 4(d) (1).”
Roy v. Roy, 715 N.E.2d 70 (Mass. App. Ct. 1999). “For purposes of decision we assume that the certified mail receipt signed by Mueller’s wife in Florida constituted “other evidence of personal delivery to the addressee satisfactory to the court,” G. L. c. 223A, § 6(6), so as to establish service of process under G.”
Christian Book Distributors, Inc. v. Wallace, 760 N.E.2d 735 (Mass. App. Ct. 2001). “” G. L. c. 223A, § 6(a)(1). Rule 4(d) of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure in turn provides that “personal service” upon an individual within the Commonwealth may be made “by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to him personally; or by leaving copies…”
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 223A, § 6(a)(3) — 2 cases
Stanley Works v. Globemaster, Inc., 400 F. Supp. 1325 (D. Mass. 1975). “Therefore, service of the individual defendants “by any form of mail addressed to the person to be served and requiring a signed receipt” under Mass.Gen.Laws ch. 223A, § 6(a)(3) is sufficient.”
Roy v. Roy, 715 N.E.2d 70 (Mass. App. Ct. 1999). “For purposes of decision we assume that the certified mail receipt signed by Mueller’s wife in Florida constituted “other evidence of personal delivery to the addressee satisfactory to the court,” G. L. c. 223A, § 6(6), so as to establish service of process under G.”
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 223A, § 6(a)(5) — 1 case
Angeles v. Uson, 31 Mass. L. Rptr. 137 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2013).
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 223A, § 6(b) — 2 cases
Polaroid Corp. v. Feely, 889 F. Supp. 21 (D. Mass. 1995). “4(e)(3); Mass.Gen.Laws Ann. ch. 223A, § 6(b) (1985) (service may be made by mail addressed to the person and requiring a signed receipt); see also United States v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.