Mass. Gen. Laws » Part III Title IV Chapter 258E
Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 258E, § 3 (2026)

Filing of complaint; impounding of case record information; filing fee; expiration of order; modification of order; time for filing; nonexclusivity of remedy

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 3. (a) A person suffering from harassment may file a complaint in the appropriate court requesting protection from such harassment. A person may petition the court under this chapter for an order that the defendant:

(i) refrain from abusing or harassing the plaintiff, whether the defendant is an adult or minor;

(ii) refrain from contacting the plaintiff, unless authorized by the court, whether the defendant is an adult or minor;

(iii) remain away from the plaintiff's household or workplace, whether the defendant is an adult or minor; and

(iv) pay the plaintiff monetary compensation for the losses suffered as a direct result of the harassment; provided, however, that compensatory damages shall include, but shall not be limited to, loss of earnings, out-of-pocket losses for injuries sustained or property damaged, cost of replacement of locks, medical expenses, cost for obtaining an unlisted phone number and reasonable attorney's fees.

(b) The court may order that information in the case record be impounded in accordance with court rule.

(c) No filing fee shall be charged for the filing of the complaint. The plaintiff shall not be charged for certified copies of any orders entered by the court, or any copies of the file reasonably required for future court action or as a result of the loss or destruction of plaintiff's copies.

(d) Any relief granted by the court shall not extend for a period exceeding 1 year. Every order shall, on its face, state the time and date the order is to expire and shall include the date and time that the matter will again be heard. If the plaintiff appears at the court at the date and time the order is to expire, the court shall determine whether or not to extend the order for any additional time reasonably necessary to protect the plaintiff or to enter a permanent order. When the expiration date stated on the order is on a date when the court is closed to business, the order shall not expire until the next date that the court is open to business. The plaintiff may appear on such next court business day at the time designated by the order to request that the order be extended. The court may also extend the order upon motion of the plaintiff, for such additional time as it deems necessary to protect the plaintiff from harassment. The fact that harassment has not occurred during the pendency of an order shall not, in itself, constitute sufficient ground for denying or failing to extend the order, or allowing an order to expire or be vacated or for refusing to issue a new order.

(e) The court may modify its order at any subsequent time upon motion by either party; provided, however, that the non-moving party shall receive sufficient notice and opportunity to be heard on said modification. When the plaintiff's address is inaccessible to the defendant as provided in section 10 and the defendant has filed a motion to modify the court's order, the court shall be responsible for notifying the plaintiff. In no event shall the court disclose any such inaccessible address.

(f) The court shall not deny any complaint filed under this chapter solely because it was not filed within a particular time period after the last alleged incident of harassment.

(g) An action commenced under this chapter shall not preclude any other civil or criminal remedies. A party filing a complaint under this chapter shall be required to disclose any prior or pending actions involving the parties; including, but not limited to, court actions, administrative proceedings and disciplinary proceedings.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39 cases (20 in the last 5 years), 2011–2026 · leading case: F.K. v. S.C., 115 N.E.3d 539 (Mass. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
F.K. v. S.C., 115 N.E.3d 539 (Mass. 2019). · cites it 12× “The plaintiffs ultimately sought harassment prevention orders, pursuant to G. L. c. 258E, § 3 ( a ), against the defendant, and a District Court judge issued the requested orders.”
Van Liew v. Stansfield, 47 N.E.3d 411 (Mass. 2016). “3 Later that day, after speaking with local police, Stansfield sought in the District Court a harassment prevention order against Van Liew pursuant to G. L. c. 258E, § 3. She alleged four incidents of harassment in her complaint: (1) Van Liew threatened Stansfield at the meet…”
Yasmin Y. v. Queshon Q., 101 Mass. App. Ct. 252 (Mass. App. Ct. 2022). “The plaintiff appeals from an order of a District Court judge denying her request for an extension of a harassment prevention order pursuant to G. L. c. 258E, § 3. A harassment prevention order was extended at a hearing after notice on the basis that the defendant committed two…”
F.W.T. v. F.T., 101 N.E.3d 336 (Mass. App. Ct. 2018). “258E order was entered against him; (2) the plaintiff violated G. L. c. 258E, § 3( g ), by failing to disclose prior or pending court actions; and (3) the evidence proffered *338 by the plaintiff at the November 22 hearing was legally inadequate to support the issuance of the c.”
Commonwealth v. Goldman, 113 N.E.3d 392 (Mass. App. Ct. 2018). “209A, § 3 ( c ) ; G. L. c. 258E, § 3 ( a ) (iii), and the corresponding language in c.”
Ellis E. v. Finn F. (Mass. App. Ct. 2019). · cites it 12× “2 orders issued pursuant to G. L. c. 258E, § 3 (a).3 This case presents another opportunity for us to clarify the requirements for obtaining relief under that statute,4 as well as the scope of relief that is available.”
F.K. v. S.C. (Mass. 2019). · cites it 11× “The plaintiffs ultimately sought harassment prevention orders, pursuant to G. L. c. 258E, § 3 (a), against the defendant, and a District Court judge issued the requested orders.”
J.C. v. J.H. (Mass. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 4× “See G. L. c. 258E, § 3(a).9 We consider this 9 Section 3(a) of c.”
V.J. v. N.J. (Mass. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 3× “The order was set to expire on October 9, 2015, and a hearing was set down for that date regarding an extension of the order. After an evidentiary hearing at which both parties testified, a judge of the Brockton Division of the District Court Department extended the harassment…”
Ilan I. v. Melody M. (Mass. App. Ct. 2019). · cites it 3× “See G. L. c. 258E, §§ 3, 11. There is an immediate right to appeal to this court from an order after notice, and from any extension order.”
Wilhelmina W. v. Uri U. (Mass. App. Ct. 2023). · cites it 3× “See G. L. c. 258E, § 3 (d). The plaintiff did not allege that the defendant ever violated the terms of his pretrial release or the terms of the first order.”
S.G. v. W.S. (Mass. App. Ct. 2025). · cites it 3× “failed to prove a prima facie case of harassment under G. L. c. 258E, § 3, because she did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that W.”
Show all 39 citing cases →
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 258E, § 3(a) — 2 cases
J.C. v. J.H. (Mass. App. Ct. 2017). “See G. L. c. 258E, § 3(a).9 We consider this 9 Section 3(a) of c.”
Palumbo v. Tusino, 29 Mass. L. Rptr. 125 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2011).
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 258E, § 3(a)(iv) — 1 case
Shipley v. Nagel Cutrell Wendell & Assocs., 31 Mass. L. Rptr. 447 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2013).
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 258E, § 3(g) — 1 case
J.C. v. J.H. (Mass. App. Ct. 2017). “See G. L. c. 258E, § 3(a).9 We consider this 9 Section 3(a) of c.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.