Massachusetts General Laws
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 277, § 65 (2026)
Service of copy of indictment for murder on prisoner, etc
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MAmalegislature.gov (official)
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 65. After the finding of an indictment for murder, the defendant, if in custody, shall forthwith be served by the sheriff or his deputy with a copy thereof and with an order of the court notifying him that the indictment will be entered forthwith upon the docket of the superior court for the county where found.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1927–2010 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Torres, 813 N.E.2d 1261 (Mass. 2004).
Commonwealth v. Torres, 813 N.E.2d 1261 (Mass. 2004). “See G. L. c. 277, § 65 (if defendant is in custody at time of indictment for murder, indictment “shall forthwith be served by the sheriff or his deputy”).”
CHARLES C. v. Commonwealth, 612 N.E.2d 229 (Mass. 1993). “Because a grand jury returns indictments to the Superior Court, see G. L. c. 277, § 65 (1990 ed.), and G. L. c.”
Torres v. Dennehy, 615 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2010). “Instead of having the sheriff serve the indictment on Torres — apparently the normal procedure, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 277 § 65 (2010) — the prosecutor sent two troopers, Barry O’Brien and Andrew Bzdel.”
Commonwealth v. Desrosier, 778 N.E.2d 1 (Mass. App. Ct. 2002). “” Thus, the defendant, who makes no claim that he was not personally served a copy of the indictment pursuant to G. L. c. 277, § 65, had notice that the crime charged included the element of intent to murder.”
Commonwealth v. Gedzium, 156 N.E. 890 (Mass. 1927). “” Thereafter, pursuant to G. L. c. 277, § 65, return of service of copy of the indictment was made by the sheriff to the effect that he had “notified the within named Jerry Gedzium, who was indicted by the name of John Doe, .”
Commonwealth v. Royce, 386 N.E.2d 23 (Mass. 1979). “See also G. L. c. 277, § 65 (copy of murder indictment to be served on prisoner); Commonwealth v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.