Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 40P, § 4 (2026)

General prohibition; exception

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 4. No city or town may enact, maintain or enforce rent control of any kind, except that any city or town that accepts this chapter may adopt rent control regulation that provides:

(a) after six months from the date of the initial adoption of rent control regulation by a particular city or town, compliance on the part of property owners as to the rent control regulation or any subsequently adopted rent control regulation shall be entirely voluntary and uncoerced, and the property of a person or entity declining to have his or its property subjected to such regulation shall be wholly unaffected by any aspect of the rent control regulation or any subsequently adopted rent control regulation;

(b) such regulation may not include the regulation of occupancy, services, evictions, condominium conversion or the removal of properties from such regulation, nor may such regulation apply to any rental unit that is owned by a person or entity owning less than ten rental units or that has a fair market rent exceeding $400; and

(c) a municipality adopting such regulation shall compensate owners of rent controlled units for each unit in the amount of the difference between the unit's fair market rent and the unit's below market, rent controlled rent, with such compensation coming from the municipality's general funds, so that the cost of any rent control shall be borne by all taxpayers of a municipality and not by the owners of regulated units only.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2006–2026 · leading case: Cella v. Attorney Gen., No. SJC 13893 (Mass. June 23, 2026).
Cella v. Attorney Gen., No. SJC 13893 (Mass. June 23, 2026). “See G. L. c. 40P, § 4. The petition, if enacted, would end the Statewide prohibition on rent control "by striking out [G.”
Realty v. McManus, 2006 Mass. App. Div. 130 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div. 2006). “G.L.c. 40P, §4. In addition, G.L.c. 40P, §5 provides that “]b]ecause rent control is a matter of statewide concern, this chapter shall preempt, supersede, or nullify any inconsistent, contrary or conflicting state or local law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.