Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 58A, § 6 (2026)

Jurisdiction

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 6. The board shall have jurisdiction to decide appeals under the provisions of: section 42E of chapter 40; sections 2 and 14 of chapter 58; clauses Seventeenth and Twenty-second of section 5 of chapter 59; sections 7, 7A, 39, 64, 65, 65B, 73 and 81 of said chapter 59; section 2 of chapter 60A; section 14 of chapter 61B; sections 39, 67 and 68 of chapter 62C; section 2 of chapter 63; section 26 of chapter 65; section 4 of chapter 65A; any other provision of law wherein such jurisdiction is or may be expressly conferred.

Except as otherwise provided by law, no appeal to the board shall stay the collection of any tax or excise.

Whenever a board of assessors, before whom an application in writing for the abatement of a tax is pending, fails to act upon said application, except with the written consent of the applicant, prior to the expiration of three months from the date of filing of such application, it shall then be deemed to be denied, and the taxpayer shall have the right, at any time within three months thereafter, to take any appeal from such denial to which he may be entitled by law, in the same manner as though the board of assessors had in fact refused to grant the abatement applied for. After the expiration of said three months from the date of filing such application, the board of assessors shall have no further authority to act upon said application; provided, however, that during the period allowed for the taking of an appeal, including instances where the application for abatement has been denied, the assessors may, by agreement with the applicant, abate the tax in whole or in part in final settlement of said application, and shall also have the authority granted to them by section 7 to abate, in whole or in part, any tax as to which an appeal has been seasonably taken.

Whenever the commissioner of revenue, before whom an application in writing for the abatement of tax is or shall be pending, fails to act upon said application prior to the expiration of six months from the date of filing of the same, it shall then be deemed to be denied unless the applicant shall have filed with the commissioner, prior to such expiration, his written consent to the failure of the commissioner to act on said application within said six months' period. Said consent may be withdrawn by the applicant at any time, in which event said application, unless previously acted on by the commissioner, shall be deemed to be denied at the expiration of said six months' period or on the date of such withdrawal, whichever is later. The applicant, at any time within six months from the date on which any such application shall be so deemed to be denied by the commissioner, shall have the right to take any appeal from such denial to which he may be entitled by law in the same manner as though the commissioner had in fact refused to grant the abatement applied for. The commissioner shall have authority to act on any application after the date of any denial if the applicant has not seasonably taken an appeal from such denial. During the period allowed for the taking of an appeal, the commissioner may, by agreement with the applicant, abate the tax in whole or in part in final settlement of said application subject to the provisions of section 37A or 37C of chapter 62C.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34 cases, 1963–2017 · leading case: EMC Corp. v. Comm'r of Revenue, 744 N.E.2d 55 (Mass. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
EMC Corp. v. Comm'r of Revenue, 744 N.E.2d 55 (Mass. 2001). “The commissioner failed to act on the application within the time provided under G. L. c. 58A, § 6, and it was deemed denied.”
SCA Disposal Servs. of New England, Inc. v. State Tax Comm'n, 376 N.E.2d 572 (Mass. 1978). · cites it 3× “Preliminarily, we note that we agree with the Attorney General’s position that SCA is incorrect in relying in any measure on G. L. c. 58A, § 6, which provides that a taxpayer may file a seasonable appeal within six months after the time the taxpayer’s application is deemed…”
Koch v. Comm'r of Revenue, 624 N.E.2d 91 (Mass. 1993). “The abatement was deemed denied due to the commissioner’s inaction, G. L. c. 58A, § 6, and G. L. c. 62C, § 39, and the taxpayer appealed to the Appellate Tax Board (board).”
Blood v. Edgar's, Inc., 632 N.E.2d 419 (Mass. App. Ct. 1994). “See G. L. c. 58A, § 6. If appropriate, the unit owner may also petition the court for equitable relief.”
Child.'s Hosp. Med. Ctr. v. Bd. of Assessors, 448 N.E.2d 748 (Mass. 1983). · cites it 2× “The assessors acknowledge that CHMC is a charitable organization and concede that Form 128 was the proper vehicle for an application for abatement of taxes.”
Indus. Fin. Corp. v. State Tax Comm'n, 326 N.E.2d 1 (Mass. 1975). “G. L. c. 58A, § 6. The taxpayer 8 then initiated timely appeals to the Board from such denials.”
Lenson v. Bd. of Assessors, 478 N.E.2d 954 (Mass. 1985). · cites it 3× “More particularly, the board ruled that, *179 though the appeal was filed within three months of the date of the notice of denial of the abatement, it was filed more than three months after expiration of the board’s authority to act under G. L. c. 58A, § 6, and c. 59, § 65 (1984…”
W. R. Grace & Co. v. Comm'r of Revenue, 393 N.E.2d 330 (Mass. 1979). “Pursuant to G. L. c. 58A, § 6, Grace initially consented to the Commissioner’s failure to act on the application within six months of the filing date, but in December, 1975, it withdrew its consent, 5 effectuating the constructive denial of *581 the application.”
FMR Corp. v. Comm'r of Revenue, 809 N.E.2d 498 (Mass. 2004). “See G. L. c. 58A, § 6. On December 15, 2000, FMR timely filed a petition with the board, appealing the commissioner’s deemed denial of its applications.”
Comm'r of Revenue v. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 420 N.E.2d 293 (Mass. 1981). “The consents were withdrawn on December 6, 1976, and the applications for abatement were deemed denied as of that date, pursuant to G. L. c. 58A, § 6. On January 10, 1977, McGraw-Hill filed an appeal from those denials with the board.”
Bd. of Assessors v. Commissioners of Hampshire Cnty., 622 N.E.2d 609 (Mass. 1993). · cites it 3× “The court noted that, perhaps for this reason, the board had been granted express jurisdiction by its governing statute, G. L. c. 58A, § 6, to hear appeals from denials of exemptions under els.”
Bayer Corp. v. Comm'r of Revenue, 436 Mass. 302 (Mass. 2002). “See G. L. c. 58A, § 6. • The taxpayer appealed to the board and a two-day hearing was held at which one member presided.”
Show all 34 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.