Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 10 / R.S. of 1846
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 10.3 (2026)

Repealed. 2000, Act 198, Imd. Eff. June 22, 2000.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Revised Statutes of 1846


R.S. of 1846


10.3 Repealed. 2000, Act 198, Imd. Eff. June 22, 2000.

    Repealed. 2000, Act 198, Imd. Eff. June 22, 2000.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed section pertained to appointment of private secretary and executive clerk.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1977–2024 · leading case: People v. Barbara, 255 N.W.2d 171 (Mich. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Barbara, 255 N.W.2d 171 (Mich. 1977). · cites it 4× “Cureton, A Consensus as to the Validity of Polygraph Procedures, 22 Tenn L Rev 728 (1953), cited in Richardson, Modern Scientific Evidence (2d ed), § 10.3, p 311. The results, however, do not appear to sustain that contention.”
Robert a Hansen Fam. Trust v. Fgh Indus., LLC, 760 N.W.2d 526 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “4 of the September agreement specifies that [t]he parties agree and stipulate that any and all claims, demands, disagreements, controversies or disputes arising out of or relating to (the operating agreement) (collectively “Claims”) shall be adjudicated exclusively in the Pima…”
Middlebrooks v. Wayne Cnty., 521 N.W.2d 774 (Mich. 1994). · cites it 2× “[3 LaFave, Search and Seizure (2d ed) (1994 Supp), § 10.3, p 234.] See also Miller, Mandatory urinalysis testing and the privacy rights of subject employees: Toward a general rule of legality under the Fourth Amendment, 48 U Pitt L R 201, 236-237 (1986).”
Rose v. Wayne Cnty. Airport Auth., 210 F. Supp. 3d 870 (E.D. Mich. 2016). · cites it 2× “Section 10.3, discussed below, specifies some requirements for the routing of pedestrian traffic at “stations in [intercity bus] systems,” and generally requires access routes to “coincide with the circulation path for the general public.”
31800 Wick Road Holdings, LLC v. Future Lodging-Airport, Inc., 848 F. Supp. 2d 757 (E.D. Mich. 2012). “(Mortgage, § 10.3.) On July 23, 2010, Wick Road sent Borrower a letter indicating its intent to use the reserve account funds to pay its costs.”
People v. Friday, 296 N.W.2d 618 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980). “’ Richardson, Modern Scientific Evidence (2d ed), § 10.3, p 310.” Since the defendant herein admitted that he had *528 been a career criminal all his adult life, the results of a polygraph might have been highly suspect.”
L J & S Dev. LLC v. Boar's Head Provisions Co. Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 13× “Section 10.3 is an indemnity provision. Indemnity refers to a “duty to make good any loss, damage, or liability incurred by another” or “[t]he right of an injured party to claim reimbursement for its loss, damage, or liability from a person who has such a duty.”
L J & S Dev. LLC v. Boar's Head Provisions Co. Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 13× “Section 10.3 is an indemnity provision. Indemnity refers to a “duty to make good any loss, damage, or liability incurred by another” or “[t]he right of an injured party to claim reimbursement for its loss, damage, or liability from a person who has such a duty.”
Sweatt v. Dep't of Corr., 637 N.W.2d 811 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001). “Welch, Worker’s Compensation in Michigan: Law & Practice (4th ed), § 10.3, p 10-4, citing Tanney v Advance Sheet Metal, Inc, 1992 Mich ACO 14; 4 MIWCLR 1287 (1992).”
Vascular Mgmt. Servs. of Novi LLC v. Emg Partners LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 3× “” The 2013 Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedure, Rule 7(a), states: “The arbitrator shall have the power to rule on his or her own jurisdiction, including any objections with respect to the existence, scope, or validity of the arbitration agreement or to the…”
Thomas L Thesier v. T B S K Ltd. P'ship (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “See section 10.3. The shopping center was constructed and financed with a mortgage from Old Kent Bank, and, when construction was finished, the loan was refinanced with Standard Insurance Company.”
Thomas L Thesier v. T B S K Ltd. P'ship (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “See section 10.3. The shopping center was constructed and financed with a mortgage from Old Kent Bank, and, when construction was finished, the loan was refinanced with Standard Insurance Company.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 10.3(a)(iii) — 2 cases
L J & S Dev. LLC v. Boar's Head Provisions Co. Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Section 10.3 is an indemnity provision. Indemnity refers to a “duty to make good any loss, damage, or liability incurred by another” or “[t]he right of an injured party to claim reimbursement for its loss, damage, or liability from a person who has such a duty.”
L J & S Dev. LLC v. Boar's Head Provisions Co. Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Section 10.3 is an indemnity provision. Indemnity refers to a “duty to make good any loss, damage, or liability incurred by another” or “[t]he right of an injured party to claim reimbursement for its loss, damage, or liability from a person who has such a duty.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 10.3(b) — 2 cases
L J & S Dev. LLC v. Boar's Head Provisions Co. Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Section 10.3 is an indemnity provision. Indemnity refers to a “duty to make good any loss, damage, or liability incurred by another” or “[t]he right of an injured party to claim reimbursement for its loss, damage, or liability from a person who has such a duty.”
L J & S Dev. LLC v. Boar's Head Provisions Co. Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Section 10.3 is an indemnity provision. Indemnity refers to a “duty to make good any loss, damage, or liability incurred by another” or “[t]he right of an injured party to claim reimbursement for its loss, damage, or liability from a person who has such a duty.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 10.3(c) — 2 cases
L J & S Dev. LLC v. Boar's Head Provisions Co. Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Section 10.3 is an indemnity provision. Indemnity refers to a “duty to make good any loss, damage, or liability incurred by another” or “[t]he right of an injured party to claim reimbursement for its loss, damage, or liability from a person who has such a duty.”
L J & S Dev. LLC v. Boar's Head Provisions Co. Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Section 10.3 is an indemnity provision. Indemnity refers to a “duty to make good any loss, damage, or liability incurred by another” or “[t]he right of an injured party to claim reimbursement for its loss, damage, or liability from a person who has such a duty.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.