Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 15 / Act 169 of 1976
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 15.407 (2026)

Compliance with federal laws or regulations; disciplinary actions.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Aug. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

POLITICAL ACTIVITIES BY PUBLIC EMPLOYEES


Act 169 of 1976


15.407 Compliance with federal laws or regulations; disciplinary actions.

Sec. 7.

    Public employees whose political activities are subject to restrictions imposed by laws or regulations of the United States shall comply with those restrictions notwithstanding any contrary provisions of this act. This act shall not be construed as prohibiting the state or a political subdivision thereof from instituting or implementing a disciplinary action against a public employee, in compliance with a determination of the United States civil service commission or a court of the United States pursuant to sections 1501 through 1508 of title 5 of the United States code.

History: 1976, Act 169, Imd. Eff. June 25, 1976

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1943–2012 · leading case: Int'l Union v. Cent. Michigan Univ. Trs., 815 N.W.2d 132 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Int'l Union v. Cent. Michigan Univ. Trs., 815 N.W.2d 132 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). “Because the trial courts’ properly determined that the CMU officials’ candidacy policy did not violate the Act, it correctly denied declaratory and injunctive relief.”
Ira Sch. D. v. Chesterfield Sch. D., 66 N.W.2d 72 (Mich. 1954). · cites it 3× “407]), the material part of which is as follows: "A township board may in its discretion detach the property of any person or persons from 1 district and attach it to another, or divide or consolidate districts: Provided, however, That * * * no district shall be divided into 2…”
Ira Sch. Dist. No. 1 Fractional v. Chesterfield Sch. Dist. No. 2 Fractional, 340 Mich. 678 (1954). · cites it 3× ““A township board may in its discretion detach the property of any person or persons from 1 district and attach it to another, or divide or consolidate districts: Provided, however, That * * * no district shall be divided into 2 or more districts without the consent of the…”
Sch. Dist. v. Sch. Dist. No. 2, 318 Mich. 363 (1947). “§§15.407, 15.408]). It is clear from a reading of section 1, and this Court has held with respect to its predecessor enactments (which did not differ in this respect) that no petition under said sections is required, and hence a petition under said sections would not.”
Crawford v. Sch. Dist. No. 6, 70 N.W.2d 789 (Mich. 1955). “1 [Stat *569 Ann 1953 Rev § 15.407]), we find that where land in a school district has been taxed for the building of a schoolhouse, it cannot be “set off into another district” without a 2/3 vote of certain people.”
Genoa Sch. Dist. No. 3 v. Brighton Area Sch. Dist., 59 N.W.2d 4 (Mich. 1953). “-14 (Stat Ann 1953 Rev §§ 15.407, 15.408, 15.419 and 15.420), which are as follows: “A township hoard may in its discretion detach the property of any person or persons from 1 district and attach it to another, or divide or consolidate districts: Provided, however, That no land…”
Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. Ann Arbor Twp. Bd., 8 N.W.2d 877 (Mich. 1943). · cites it 2× “§ 15.407 et seq.), and particularly under 2 Comp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.