Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 168.748 (2026)

Contested election; petition to determine qualifications of electors.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN ELECTION LAW


Act 116 of 1954


168.748 Contested election; petition to determine qualifications of electors.

Sec. 748.

    After issue joined in any case of contested election, either party to the cause may present a petition to the court before which the said cause is to be tried, setting forth among other things that the petitioner has good reason to believe and does believe that 1 or more voters at the election out of which the cause has arisen, naming him or them, and stating his or their place of residence, were unqualified to vote at such election; that he believes the same can be established by competent testimony; that the ballot or ballots of such voter or voters were received after being challenged, as provided by law; and praying that the court may try and determine the question of the qualification of such voter or voters at said election, which petition shall be verified by the oath of the petitioner or some other person acquainted with the facts, and thereupon the court shall direct an issue to be framed, within a time to be fixed therefor, for the purpose of determining the question of the qualifications of the voter or voters named in said petition to vote at said election; and such issue shall stand for trial as in other cases, and the verdict of the jury or judgment of the court upon such issue so made shall be received, upon the trial of the principal issue in said cause, as conclusive evidence to establish or to disprove the said qualifications of said voter or voters.

History: 1954, Act 116, Eff. June 1, 1955

PopularName Notes:

Election Code
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2007–2026 · leading case: In Re Request for Advisory Opinion Regarding Constitutionality of 2005 Pa 71, 740 N.W.2d 444 (Mich. 2007).
In Re Request for Advisory Opinion Regarding Constitutionality of 2005 Pa 71, 740 N.W.2d 444 (Mich. 2007). · cites it 2× “" The ballot cast by a challenged voter is marked (and the mark subsequently concealed) with a number corresponding to the voter's poll list number, and is counted as a regular ballot.”
Promote the Vote v. Sec'y of State (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “747 or MCL 168.748] or any other applicable law.”
In re (Iowa 2026). · cites it 2× “” Mich. Comp. Laws § 168.748 (2026). In Nebraska, a contestant who alleges some “votes are illegal” must provide “the names of the voters whose votes are contested.”
Muhith Mahmood v. City of Hamtramck (Mich. Ct. App. 2026). “745, and such a challenge is resolved if it is determined that the voter was qualified to vote in the election, MCL 168.748. -4- judgment”).5 I therefore agree with the trial court that the Wayne County Board of Canvassers did not have a clear legal duty to tabulate the 37…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.