MICHIGAN CAMPAIGN FINANCE ACT
Act 388 of 1976
169.206 "Expenditure" defined.
Sec. 6.
(1) "Expenditure" means a payment, donation, loan, or promise of payment of money or anything of ascertainable monetary value for goods, materials, services, or facilities in assistance of, or in opposition to, the nomination or election of a candidate, the qualification, passage, or defeat of a ballot question, or the qualification of a new political party. Expenditure includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(a) A contribution or a transfer of anything of ascertainable monetary value for purposes of influencing the nomination or election of a candidate, the qualification, passage, or defeat of a ballot question, or the qualification of a new political party.
(b) Except as provided in subsection (2)(f) or (g), an expenditure for voter registration or get-out-the-vote activities made by a person who sponsors or finances the activity or who is identified by name with the activity.
(c) Except as provided in subsection (2)(f) or (g), an expenditure made for poll watchers, challengers, distribution of election day literature, canvassing of voters to get out the vote, or transporting voters to the polls.
(2) Expenditure does not include any of the following:
(a) An expenditure for communication by a person with the person's paid members or shareholders and those individuals who can be solicited for contributions to a separate segregated fund under section 55.
(b) An expenditure for communication on a subject or issue if the communication does not support or oppose a ballot question or candidate by name or clear inference.
(c) An expenditure for the establishment or administration of, or solicitation, collection, or transfer of contributions to, a separate segregated fund, including through a payroll deduction plan, or for mailing or shipping of an item or prize purchased under section 55(8).
(d) An expenditure by a broadcasting station, newspaper, magazine, or other periodical or publication for a news story, commentary, or editorial in support of or opposition to a candidate for elective office or a ballot question in the regular course of publication or broadcasting.
(e) An offer or tender of an expenditure if expressly and unconditionally rejected or returned.
(f) An expenditure for nonpartisan voter registration or nonpartisan get-out-the-vote activities made by an organization that is exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code, 26 USC 501, or any successor statute.
(g) An expenditure for nonpartisan voter registration or nonpartisan get-out-the-vote activities performed under chapter XXIII of the Michigan election law, 1954 PA 116, MCL 168.491 to 168.523a, by the secretary of state and other registration officials who are identified by name with the activity.
(h) An expenditure by a state central committee of a political party or a person controlled by a state central committee of a political party for the construction, purchase, or renovation of 1 or more office facilities in Ingham County if the facility is not constructed, purchased, or renovated for the purpose of influencing the election of a candidate in a particular election. Items excluded from the definition of expenditure under this subdivision include expenditures approved in Federal Election Commission advisory opinions 1993-9, 2001-1, and 2001-12 as allowable expenditures under the federal election campaign act of 1971, 52 USC 30101 to 30146, and regulations promulgated under that act, regardless of whether those advisory opinions have been superseded.
(i) Except only for the purposes of section 57, an expenditure to or for a federal candidate or a federal committee.
(j) Except only for the purposes of section 47, an expenditure for a communication if the communication does not in express terms advocate the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate so as to restrict the application of this act to communications containing express words of advocacy of election or defeat, such as "vote for", "elect", "support", "cast your ballot for", "Smith for governor", "vote against", "defeat", or "reject".
History: 1976, Act 388, Imd. Eff. Dec. 30, 1976 ;-- Am. 1989, Act 95, Imd. Eff. June 21, 1989 ;-- Am. 1994, Act 117, Eff. Apr. 1, 1995 ;-- Am. 1995, Act 264, Eff. Mar. 28, 1996 ;-- Am. 2003, Act 69, Imd. Eff. July 22, 2003 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 31, Imd. Eff. Feb. 28, 2012 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 273, Eff. Dec. 30, 2012 ;-- Am. 2013, Act 252, Imd. Eff. Dec. 27, 2013 ;-- Am. 2015, Act 269, Imd. Eff. Jan. 6, 2016 ;-- Am. 2017, Act 119, Imd. Eff. Sept. 20, 2017 ;-- Am. 2018, Act 607, Imd. Eff. Dec. 28, 2018 ;-- Am. 2019, Act 93, Imd. Eff. Oct. 10, 2019 ;-- Am. 2023, Act 244, Eff. Feb. 13, 2024
Compiler's Notes:
Section 2 of Act 264 of 1995 provides:
“If any portion of this amendatory act or the application of this amendatory act to any person or circumstance is found to be invalid by a court, the invalidity does not affect the remaining portions or applications of this amendatory act that can be given effect without the invalid portion or application, if those remaining portions are not determined by the court to be inoperable. To this end, this amendatory act is declared to be severable.”
Enacting section 1 of Act 31 of 2012 provides:
"Enacting section 1. It is the policy of this state that a public body shall maintain strict neutrality in each election and that a public body or a person acting on behalf of a public body shall not attempt to influence the outcome of an election held in the state. If there is a perceived ambiguity in the interpretation of section 57, that section shall be construed to best effectuate the policy of strict neutrality by a public body in an election."
Notes of Decisions
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State, 489 Mich. 194 (Mich. 2010).
· cites it 45× “The Court directed the parties to brief (1) whether a school district’s use of government resources for a payroll deduction plan for contributions made by members of [the *201 MEA] to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of…”
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State, 793 N.W.2d 568 (Mich. 2010).
· cites it 46× “Michigan Education Association (MEA) to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of the Michigan Campaign Finance Act (MCFA), MCL 169.206; (2) whether § 57(1) of the MCFA, MCL 169.”
United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'n, 484 Mich. 1 (Mich. 2009).
“The Michigan Campaign Finance Act, MCL 169.201 et seg., does not regulate certain expenditures, including those “for communication on a subject or issue if the communication does not support or oppose a ballot question or candidate by name or clear inference.”
Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 669 N.W.2d 265 (Mich. 2003).
“…exactly because advertisements run in opposition to various Supreme Court candidates are not regulated by M.C.L. § 169.206(2).”
Michigan State Chamber of Com. v. Austin, 643 F. Supp. 397 (W.D. Mich. 1986).
· cites it 4× “§ 169.206(1). Within the larger class of expenditures, the Act defines an “independent expenditure” as “an expenditure .”
Huron Valley Schs. v. Sec'y of State, 702 N.W.2d 862 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005).
“” In count II, plaintiffs alleged that the MCFA does not prohibit plaintiff associations from using internal school district communication systems because that use *645 is not an expenditure under MCL 169.206. Plaintiffs alleged that defendant’s “decision” prevented them from…”
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State (Mich. 2011).
· cites it 43× “(1) whether a school district’s use of government resources for a payroll deduction plan for contributions made by members of [the MEA] to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of the [MCFA], MCL 169.206; (2) whether § 57(1) of…”
Austin v. Michigan State Chamber of Com., 494 U.S. 652 (1990).
· cites it 6× “" Mich. Comp. Laws § 169.206 (1) (1979). That is indeed the Court's sole basis for distinguishing First National Bank of Boston v.”
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State, 764 N.W.2d 575 (Mich. 2009).
“n 56 days of the date of this order addressing the following issues: (1) whether a school district’s use of government resources for a payroll deduction plan for contributions made by members of plaintiff Michigan Education Association (MEA) to MEA’s political action committee…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 169.206(1) — 7 cases
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State, 489 Mich. 194 (Mich. 2010).
“The Court directed the parties to brief (1) whether a school district’s use of government resources for a payroll deduction plan for contributions made by members of [the *201 MEA] to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of…”
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State, 793 N.W.2d 568 (Mich. 2010).
“Michigan Education Association (MEA) to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of the Michigan Campaign Finance Act (MCFA), MCL 169.206; (2) whether § 57(1) of the MCFA, MCL 169.”
Michigan State Chamber of Com. v. Austin, 643 F. Supp. 397 (W.D. Mich. 1986).
“§ 169.206(1). Within the larger class of expenditures, the Act defines an “independent expenditure” as “an expenditure .”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 169.206(1)(a) — 1 case
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State, 793 N.W.2d 568 (Mich. 2010).
“Michigan Education Association (MEA) to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of the Michigan Campaign Finance Act (MCFA), MCL 169.206; (2) whether § 57(1) of the MCFA, MCL 169.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 169.206(2) — 5 cases
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State, 489 Mich. 194 (Mich. 2010).
“The Court directed the parties to brief (1) whether a school district’s use of government resources for a payroll deduction plan for contributions made by members of [the *201 MEA] to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of…”
Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 669 N.W.2d 265 (Mich. 2003).
“…exactly because advertisements run in opposition to various Supreme Court candidates are not regulated by M.C.L. § 169.206(2).”
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State, 793 N.W.2d 568 (Mich. 2010).
“Michigan Education Association (MEA) to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of the Michigan Campaign Finance Act (MCFA), MCL 169.206; (2) whether § 57(1) of the MCFA, MCL 169.”
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State (Mich. 2011).
“(1) whether a school district’s use of government resources for a payroll deduction plan for contributions made by members of [the MEA] to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of the [MCFA], MCL 169.206; (2) whether § 57(1) of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 169.206(2)(b) — 3 cases
United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'n, 484 Mich. 1 (Mich. 2009).
“The Michigan Campaign Finance Act, MCL 169.201 et seg., does not regulate certain expenditures, including those “for communication on a subject or issue if the communication does not support or oppose a ballot question or candidate by name or clear inference.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 169.206(2)(c) — 4 cases
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State, 489 Mich. 194 (Mich. 2010).
“The Court directed the parties to brief (1) whether a school district’s use of government resources for a payroll deduction plan for contributions made by members of [the *201 MEA] to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of…”
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State, 793 N.W.2d 568 (Mich. 2010).
“Michigan Education Association (MEA) to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of the Michigan Campaign Finance Act (MCFA), MCL 169.206; (2) whether § 57(1) of the MCFA, MCL 169.”
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State (Mich. 2011).
“(1) whether a school district’s use of government resources for a payroll deduction plan for contributions made by members of [the MEA] to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of the [MCFA], MCL 169.206; (2) whether § 57(1) of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 169.206(2)(e) — 4 cases
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State, 489 Mich. 194 (Mich. 2010).
“The Court directed the parties to brief (1) whether a school district’s use of government resources for a payroll deduction plan for contributions made by members of [the *201 MEA] to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of…”
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State, 793 N.W.2d 568 (Mich. 2010).
“Michigan Education Association (MEA) to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of the Michigan Campaign Finance Act (MCFA), MCL 169.206; (2) whether § 57(1) of the MCFA, MCL 169.”
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State (Mich. 2011).
“(1) whether a school district’s use of government resources for a payroll deduction plan for contributions made by members of [the MEA] to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of the [MCFA], MCL 169.206; (2) whether § 57(1) of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 169.206(3)(d) — 2 cases
Michigan State Chamber of Com. v. Austin, 643 F. Supp. 397 (W.D. Mich. 1986).
“§ 169.206(1). Within the larger class of expenditures, the Act defines an “independent expenditure” as “an expenditure .”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 169.206(l)(a) — 1 case
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State, 793 N.W.2d 568 (Mich. 2010).
“Michigan Education Association (MEA) to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of the Michigan Campaign Finance Act (MCFA), MCL 169.206; (2) whether § 57(1) of the MCFA, MCL 169.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.