Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 206.112 (2026)

Capital gains and losses.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

INCOME TAX ACT OF 1967


Act 281 of 1967


206.112 Capital gains and losses.

Sec. 112.

    (1) Capital gains and losses from sales or exchanges of real property located in this state are allocable to this state.

    (2) Capital gains and losses from sales or exchanges of tangible personal property are allocable to this state if:

    (a) The property had a situs in this state at the time of the sale; or

    (b) The taxpayer is a resident partnership, estate or trust or individual of this state or has a commercial domicile in this state and the taxpayer is not taxable in the state in which the property had a situs.

    (3) Capital gains and losses from sales or exchanges of intangible personal property are allocable to this state if the taxpayer is a resident partnership, estate or trust or individual of this state or has a commercial domicile in this state.

History: 1967, Act 281, Eff. Oct. 1, 1967 ;-- Am. 1969, Act 332, Imd. Eff. Nov. 4, 1969

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Vectren Infrastructure Servs. Corp v. Dep't of Treasury (Mich. 2023).
Vectren Infrastructure Servs. Corp v. Dep't of Treasury (Mich. 2023). “46 MCL 206.112(3) (“Capital gains and losses from sales or exchanges of intangible personal property are allocable to this state if the taxpayer is a resident partnership, estate or trust or individual of this state or has a commercial domicile in this state.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 206.112(3) — 1 case
Vectren Infrastructure Servs. Corp v. Dep't of Treasury (Mich. 2023). “46 MCL 206.112(3) (“Capital gains and losses from sales or exchanges of intangible personal property are allocable to this state if the taxpayer is a resident partnership, estate or trust or individual of this state or has a commercial domicile in this state.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.