Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 207 / Act 255 of 1978
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 207.651 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

COMMERCIAL REDEVELOPMENT ACT


Act 255 of 1978


207.651 Short title.

Sec. 1.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "commercial redevelopment act".

History: 1978, Act 255, Imd. Eff. June 21, 1978

Compiler's Notes:

    For transfer of powers and duties under the commercial redevelopment act from the department of commerce to the chief executive officer of the Michigan jobs commission, see E.R.O. No. 1996-2, compiled at MCL 445.2001 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2009–2025 · leading case: Superior Hotels, LLC v. MacKinaw Twp., 765 N.W.2d 31 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Superior Hotels, LLC v. MacKinaw Twp., 765 N.W.2d 31 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “572 (relating to industrial development districts), 1905 PA 282 , MCL 207.”
Sunnybrook Golf Bowl & Motel Inc v. City of Sterling Heights (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “182, and the commercial redevelopment act, 1978 PA 255 , MCL 207.651 to 207.668, has been incorrectly reported or omitted for any previous year, but not to exceed the current assessment year and 2 years immediately preceding the date the incorrect reporting or omission was…”
Sunnybrook Golf Bowl & Motel Inc v. City of Sterling Heights (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “182, and the commercial redevelopment act, 1978 PA 255 , MCL 207.651 to 207.668, has been incorrectly reported or omitted for any previous year, but not to exceed the current assessment year and 2 years immediately preceding the date the incorrect reporting or omission was…”
Ramone Jackson v. Mayor of Detroit (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “(c) The amount levied by the city for its own use during the city’s fiscal year from the specific tax levied under the commercial redevelopment act, 1978 PA 255 , MCL 207.651 to 207.668. [MCL 117.4a(9)(a), (b), and (c).”
Sixarp LLC v. Twp. of Byron (Mich. 2025). “For instance, when an assessment dispute relates to the “valuation of property that is subject to taxation” under the Commercial Redevelopment Act, MCL 207.651 et seq., or other enumerated statutes, “the assessment may be protested before the board of review or appealed directly…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.