Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.24

Property tax assessment roll; time; use of computerized database system.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE GENERAL PROPERTY TAX ACT


Act 206 of 1893


211.24 Property tax assessment roll; time; use of computerized database system.

Sec. 24.

    (1) On or before the first Monday in March in each year, the assessor shall make and complete an assessment roll, upon which he or she shall set down all of the following:

    (a) The name and address of every person liable to be taxed in the local tax collecting unit with a full description of all the real property liable to be taxed. If the name of the owner or occupant of any tract or parcel of real property is known, the assessor shall enter the name and address of the owner or occupant opposite to the description of the property. If unknown, the real property described upon the roll shall be assessed as "owner unknown". All contiguous subdivisions of any section that are owned by 1 person, firm, corporation, or other legal entity and all unimproved lots in any block that are contiguous and owned by 1 person, firm, corporation, or other legal entity shall be assessed as 1 parcel, unless demand in writing is made by the owner or occupant to have each subdivision of the section or each lot assessed separately. However, failure to assess contiguous parcels as entireties does not invalidate the assessment as made. Each description shall show as near as possible the number of acres contained in it, as determined by the assessor. It is not necessary for the assessment roll to specify the quantity of land comprised in any town, city, or village lot.

    (b) The assessor shall estimate, according to his or her best information and judgment, the true cash value and assessed value of every parcel of real property and set the assessed value down opposite the parcel.

    (c) The assessor shall calculate the tentative taxable value of every parcel of real property and set that value down opposite the parcel.

    (d) The assessor shall determine the percentage of value of every parcel of real property that is exempt from the tax levied by a local school district for school operating purposes to the extent provided under section 1211 of the revised school code, 1976 PA 451, MCL 380.1211, and set that percentage of value down opposite the parcel.

    (e) The assessor shall determine the date of the last transfer of ownership of every parcel of real property occurring after December 31, 1994 and set that date down opposite the parcel.

    (f) The assessor shall estimate the true cash value of all the personal property of each person, and set the assessed value and tentative taxable value down opposite the name of the person. In determining the property to be assessed and in estimating the value of that property, the assessor is not bound to follow the statements of any person, but shall exercise his or her best judgment. For taxes levied after December 31, 2003, the assessor shall separately state the assessed value and tentative taxable value of any leasehold improvements.

    (g) Property assessed to a person other than the owner shall be assessed separately from the owner's property and shall show in what capacity it is assessed to that person, whether as agent, guardian, or otherwise. Two or more persons not being copartners, owning personal property in common, may each be assessed severally for each person's portion. Undivided interests in lands owned by tenants in common, or joint tenants not being copartners, may be assessed to the owners.

    (2) Subject to this section, a local tax collecting unit may use a computerized database system as the assessment roll described in subsection (1) if the local tax collecting unit and the assessor certify in a form and manner prescribed by the state tax commission that the proposed system has the capacity to enable a local tax collecting unit to comply and the local tax collecting unit complies with all of the following requirements:

    (a) The assessor shall certify the assessment roll and maintain a computer printed format or a disk, external drive, or other electronic data processing format compatible with the computer system used by the local tax collecting unit. The affidavit attached to or included with the assessment roll shall include documentation that the assessment roll has been backed up through a computer backup system and a sworn statement by the assessor that the backup system contains a true and complete record of the assessment roll. The affidavit attached to or included with the assessment roll shall include documentation that authorizes and reports all changes in the assessment roll as certified by the assessor.

    (b) The local tax collecting unit shall certify and maintain a retention policy that complies with the requirements of section 11 of the Michigan history center act, 2016 PA 470, MCL 399.11, and section 491 of the Michigan penal code, 1931 PA 328, MCL 750.491.

    (c) The local tax collecting unit shall certify that the computerized database system has internal and external security procedures sufficient to assure the integrity of the system.

    (d) Not later than May 1 of the third year following the year in which a local tax collecting unit begins using a computerized database system as the assessment roll in accordance with this subsection and every 3 years thereafter, the local tax collecting unit shall certify to the state tax commission that the requirements of this subsection are being met.

    (e) An assessor or local tax collecting unit that provides a computer terminal for public viewing of the assessment roll is considered as having the assessment roll available for public inspection.

    (f) If at any time the state tax commission believes that a local tax collecting unit is no longer in compliance with this subsection, the state tax commission shall provide written notice to the local tax collecting unit. The notice shall specify the reasons that use of the computerized database system as the original assessment roll is no longer in compliance with this subsection. The local tax collecting unit has 60 days to provide evidence that the local tax collecting unit is in compliance with this subsection or that action to correct noncompliance has been implemented. If, after the expiration of 60 days, the state tax commission believes that the local tax collecting unit is not taking satisfactory steps to correct a condition of noncompliance, the state tax commission upon its own motion may withdraw approval of the use of the computerized database system as the original assessment roll. Proceedings of the state tax commission under this subsection shall be in accordance with rules for other proceedings for the commission promulgated under the administrative procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.201 to 24.328, and shall not be considered a contested case.

History: 1893, Act 206, Eff. June 12, 1893 ;-- CL 1897, 3847 ;-- Am. 1899, Act 262, Eff. Sept. 23, 1899 ;-- Am. 1907, Act 326, Eff. Sept. 28, 1907 ;-- CL 1915, 4018 ;-- CL 1929, 3412 ;-- Am. 1941, Act 234, Imd. Eff. June 16, 1941 ;-- Am. 1945, Act 159, Imd. Eff. May 16, 1945 ;-- Am. 1947, Act 93, Eff. Oct. 11, 1947 ;-- CL 1948, 211.24 ;-- Am. 1949, Act 285, Eff. Sept. 23, 1949 ;-- Am. 1963, Act 66, Eff. Sept. 6, 1963 ;-- Am. 1994, Act 415, Imd. Eff. Dec. 29, 1994 ;-- Am. 2002, Act 620, Imd. Eff. Dec. 23, 2002 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 409, Imd. Eff. Dec. 20, 2012 ;-- Am. 2016, Act 25, Eff. May 30, 2016 ;-- Am. 2017, Act 176, Eff. Feb. 19, 2018

Compiler's Notes:

    For transfer of powers and duties of department of environmental quality to department of natural resources and environment, see E.R.O. No. 2009-31, compiled at MCL 324.99919.

PopularName Notes:

Act 206
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 38 cases, 1953–2019 · leading case: Ford Motor Company v. City of Woodhaven
Ford Motor Company v. City of Woodhaven (2006) mich · cites it 6× “MCL 211.24(1); United States Radiator Corp.”
CAF Investment Co. v. Saginaw Township (1981) mich · cites it 4× “" [4] Therefore, on remand, according to our 1974 CAF opinion the assessing agency is not limited to "plugging in actual rent" in the income capitalization *486 formula, for under MCL 211.24; MSA 7.24, the assessor is required to reach a particular result, i.”
Autodie LLC v. City of Grand Rapids (2014) michctapp · cites it 3× “MCL 211.24(f); Ford Motor Co, 475 Mich at 446 .”
Walgreen Co. v. MacOmb Township (2008) michctapp · cites it 4× “MCL 211.24(1)(a) provides in part that each March, the local assessor shall make and complete an assessment roll and include [t]he name and address of every person liable to be taxed in the local tax collecting unit with a full description of all the real property liable to be…”
Briggs Tax Service, LLC v. Detroit Public Schools (2010) mich “27 See MCL 211.24(b), MCL 211.29, and MCL 211.42.”
Forest Hills Cooperative v. City of Ann Arbor (2014) michctapp “24(a) provides, in pertinent part: All contiguous subdivisions of any section that are owned by 1 person, firm, corporation, or other legal entity and all unimproved lots in any block that are contiguous and owned by 1 person, firm, corporation, or other legal entity shall be…”
Titus v. State Tax Commission (1965) mich · cites it 4× “s their claim that in 1963 the Lansing assessor assessed about 20% of the real property in Lansing, including their own, by a method of assessment different from that used in the assessment of the remainder of the real property in the city, thereby depriving them of the…”
WPW Acquisition Co. v. City of Troy (2002) michctapp · cites it 2× “24(1) requires the property assessor, in preparing the assessment roll, to "estimate, according to his or her best information and judgment, the true cash value and assessed value of every parcel of real property and set the assessed value down opposite the parcel." Subsection…”
Great Lakes Div. v. City of Ecorse (1998) michctapp “§ 211.24(1); M.S.A. § 7.24(1) ("All contiguous subdivisions of any section that are owned by 1 person, firm, corporation, .”
Great Lakes Division of National Steel Corp. v. City of Ecorse (1998) michctapp “See MCL 211.24(1); MSA 7.24(1) (“[a]ll contiguous subdivisions of any section that are owned by 1 person, firm, corporation, .”
Wayne County v. Michigan State Tax Commission (2004) michctapp “MCL 211.24; MSA 7.24. These central assessment provisions do not *242 include power generating public utilities, which thus remain under local assessment.”
Washtenaw County v. State Tax Commission (1985) mich “MCL 211.24; MSA 7.24. This statute provides that "[o]n or before the first Monday in March” the local assessor "shall estimate, according to his best information and judgment, the true cash value of every parcel of real property and set the same down opposite such parcel.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.24(1) — 5 cases
Ford Motor Company v. City of Woodhaven (2006) mich “MCL 211.24(1); United States Radiator Corp.”
WPW Acquisition Co. v. City of Troy (2002) michctapp “24(1) requires the property assessor, in preparing the assessment roll, to "estimate, according to his or her best information and judgment, the true cash value and assessed value of every parcel of real property and set the assessed value down opposite the parcel." Subsection…”
Great Lakes Div. v. City of Ecorse (1998) michctapp “§ 211.24(1); M.S.A. § 7.24(1) ("All contiguous subdivisions of any section that are owned by 1 person, firm, corporation, .”
Great Lakes Division of National Steel Corp. v. City of Ecorse (1998) michctapp “See MCL 211.24(1); MSA 7.24(1) (“[a]ll contiguous subdivisions of any section that are owned by 1 person, firm, corporation, .”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.24(1)(a) — 1 case
Walgreen Co. v. MacOmb Township (2008) michctapp “MCL 211.24(1)(a) provides in part that each March, the local assessor shall make and complete an assessment roll and include [t]he name and address of every person liable to be taxed in the local tax collecting unit with a full description of all the real property liable to be…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.24(1)(f) — 1 case
Ford Motor Company v. City of Woodhaven (2006) mich “MCL 211.24(1); United States Radiator Corp.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.24(1)(g) — 1 case
Walgreen Co. v. MacOmb Township (2008) michctapp “MCL 211.24(1)(a) provides in part that each March, the local assessor shall make and complete an assessment roll and include [t]he name and address of every person liable to be taxed in the local tax collecting unit with a full description of all the real property liable to be…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.24(a) — 2 cases
Forest Hills Cooperative v. City of Ann Arbor (2014) michctapp “24(a) provides, in pertinent part: All contiguous subdivisions of any section that are owned by 1 person, firm, corporation, or other legal entity and all unimproved lots in any block that are contiguous and owned by 1 person, firm, corporation, or other legal entity shall be…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.24(b) — 1 case
Briggs Tax Service, LLC v. Detroit Public Schools (2010) mich “27 See MCL 211.24(b), MCL 211.29, and MCL 211.42.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.24(d) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.24(f) — 1 case
Autodie LLC v. City of Grand Rapids (2014) michctapp “MCL 211.24(f); Ford Motor Co, 475 Mich at 446 .”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.24(l)(a) — 1 case
Walgreen Co. v. MacOmb Township (2008) michctapp “MCL 211.24(1)(a) provides in part that each March, the local assessor shall make and complete an assessment roll and include [t]he name and address of every person liable to be taxed in the local tax collecting unit with a full description of all the real property liable to be…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.24(l)(f) — 1 case
Ford Motor Company v. City of Woodhaven (2006) mich “MCL 211.24(1); United States Radiator Corp.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.24(l)(g) — 1 case
Walgreen Co. v. MacOmb Township (2008) michctapp “MCL 211.24(1)(a) provides in part that each March, the local assessor shall make and complete an assessment roll and include [t]he name and address of every person liable to be taxed in the local tax collecting unit with a full description of all the real property liable to be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.