Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 213.188 (2026)

Benefits to owners; deduction from damage costs.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Aug. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ACQUIRING PROPERTY FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES


Act 352 of 1925


213.188 Benefits to owners; deduction from damage costs.

Sec. 18.

    If any discontinued highway shall be upon lands through which a new highway shall be laid out, the same may be taken into consideration in estimating the damages sustained by the owner of such lands; and in like manner the benefits accruing to owners of lands by reason of laying-out, altering, widening or otherwise improving any highway or of changing the line thereof, shall be taken into consideration in determining the damages to be paid to any such owner as compensation for the taking of any of his property for any such highway purpose. In each such case, the board or commissioner having the matter in charge, or the court commissioners, as the case may be, shall state such fact and the amount deducted on account thereof in the determination, or report, as the case may be: Provided, however, That benefits shall not be taken into consideration as above stated in case there is any assessment levied on the abutting property by reason of the laying out, altering, widening or otherwise improving said highway.

History: 1925, Act 352, Imd. Eff. May 27, 1925 ;-- CL 1929, 3901 ;-- Am. 1931, Act 216, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931 ;-- Am. 1941, Act 279, Eff. Jan. 10, 1942 ;-- CL 1948, 213.188

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1963–1971 · leading case: State High. Comm'n v. Frederick, 188 N.W.2d 193 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
State High. Comm'n v. Frederick, 188 N.W.2d 193 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971). · cites it 6× “Secondly, they claim that the new service road was not a benefit to the property within the meaning of MCLA § 213.188 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 8.189) 1 *240 The state claims that the service road does in fact benefit the west remainder and whether termed general or special is…”
Eilender v. City of Pontiac, 124 N.W.2d 806 (Mich. 1963). · cites it 2× “" For authority providing that such deduction should be made in given circumstances, see CL 1948, § 213.188 (Stat Ann 1958 Rev § 8.189). I allude to this in order that the question of such possible legal effect be not taken as having been decided, indirectly or otherwise, upon…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.