Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 24 / Act 306 of 1969
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 24.258 (2026)

Request for preparation of reproduction proofs or negatives of rules; reimbursement; publication of rules electronically or in pamphlets; cost.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Aug. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT OF 1969


Act 306 of 1969


24.258 Request for preparation of reproduction proofs or negatives of rules; reimbursement; publication of rules electronically or in pamphlets; cost.

Sec. 58.

    (1) When requested by an agency, the office of regulatory reform shall prepare reproduction proofs or negatives of the rules, or a portion of the rules, of the agency. The requesting agency shall reimburse the office of regulatory reform for preparing the reproduction proofs or negatives, and the cost of the preparation shall be paid out of appropriations to the agency.

    (2) The Michigan administrative code may be arranged and printed to make convenient the publication electronically or in separate pamphlets of the parts of the Michigan administrative code relating to different agencies. Agencies may order the separate pamphlets, and the cost of the pamphlets shall be paid out of appropriations to the agencies.

History: 1969, Act 306, Eff. July 1, 1970 ;-- Am. 1982, Act 413, Eff. Jan. 1, 1984 ;-- Am. 1986, Act 292, Imd. Eff. Dec. 22, 1986 ;-- Am. 1999, Act 262, Eff. Apr. 1, 2000

PopularName Notes:

Act 306

PopularName Notes:

APA
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1977–1977 · leading case: Muskegon Twp. v. Muskegon Cnty. Drain Comm'r, 257 N.W.2d 224 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Muskegon Twp. v. Muskegon Cnty. Drain Comm'r, 257 N.W.2d 224 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “Plaintiffs failed to receive notice as required by the Administrative Procedures Act, MCLA 24.258; MSA 3.560(158). The Drain Code of 1956, 1956 PA 40 , § 1, MCLA 280.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.