Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 259.441 (2026)

Airport hazard declared nuisance; prevention.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

AIRPORT ZONING ACT


Act 23 of 1950 (Ex. Sess.)


259.441 Airport hazard declared nuisance; prevention.

Sec. 11.

    It is hereby found that an airport hazard endangers the lives and property of the general public, of users of the airport and of occupants of land in its vicinity, and also, if of the obstruction type, in effect reduces the size of the area available for the landing, taking-off, and maneuvering of aircraft, thus tending to destroy or impair the utility of the airport and the public investment therein. Accordingly, it is hereby declared: (a) That the creation or establishment or maintenance of an airport hazard is a public nuisance and an injury to the community served by the airport in question; and (b) that it is therefore necessary in the interest of the public health, public safety, and general welfare that the creation or establishment of airport hazards be prevented. It is further declared that both the prevention of the creation or establishment of airport hazards and the elimination, removal, alteration, mitigation, abatement, or marking or lighting of existing airport hazards are public purposes for which political subdivisions may raise and expend public funds and acquire land or property rights therein.

History: 1950, Ex. Sess., Act 23, Imd. Eff. June 7, 1950

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: Pegasus Wind LLC v. Tuscola Cnty. (Mich. 2024).
Pegasus Wind LLC v. Tuscola Cnty. (Mich. 2024). “7 structure or tree or use of land or of appurtenances thereof which obstructs the air space required for the safe flight of aircraft in landing or taking off at an airport or is otherwise hazardous or creates hazards to such safe landing or taking off of aircraft.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.