Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 259.457 (2026)

Board of appeals; provision, powers.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

AIRPORT ZONING ACT


Act 23 of 1950 (Ex. Sess.)


259.457 Board of appeals; provision, powers.

Sec. 27.

    All airport zoning regulations adopted under the provisions of this act shall provide for a board of appeals to have and exercise the following powers:

    (a) To hear and decide appeals from any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by the administrative agency in the enforcement of the zoning regulations, as provided in section 29;

    (b) To hear and decide any special exceptions to the terms of the airport zoning regulations upon which such board may be required to pass under such regulations;

    (c) To hear and decide specific variances under section 24.

History: 1950, Ex. Sess., Act 23, Imd. Eff. June 7, 1950

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2022–2024 · leading case: Tuscola Area Airport Zoning Bd of Appeals v. Aeronautics Comm (Mich. Ct. App. 2022).
Tuscola Area Airport Zoning Bd of Appeals v. Aeronautics Comm (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 3× “Appellees argue that the AZBA lacks any authority to file an administrative appeal, noting the limited nature of its authority delineated in MCL 259.457 and the Tuscola Airport Zoning Ordinance (the Airport Ordinance).”
Pegasus Wind LLC v. Tuscola Cnty. (Mich. 2024). · cites it 3× “454; MCL 259.457. 7 Pegasus Wind, LLC v Tuscola Area Airport Zoning Bd of Appeals, 507 Mich 871 (2021); Pegasus Wind, LLC v Tuscola Area Airport Zoning Bd of Appeals, unpublished order of the Court of Appeals, entered February 26, 2020 (Docket No.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 259.457(c) — 1 case
Pegasus Wind LLC v. Tuscola Cnty. (Mich. 2024). “454; MCL 259.457. 7 Pegasus Wind, LLC v Tuscola Area Airport Zoning Bd of Appeals, 507 Mich 871 (2021); Pegasus Wind, LLC v Tuscola Area Airport Zoning Bd of Appeals, unpublished order of the Court of Appeals, entered February 26, 2020 (Docket No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.