Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.841 (2026)

Program not entitlement or right; administration of program subject to appropriation.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Aug. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

VOLUNTEER EMPLOYEE CRIMINAL HISTORY SYSTEM ACT


Act 23 of 2023


28.841 Program not entitlement or right; administration of program subject to appropriation.

Sec. 11.

    This program does not create an entitlement or right to use the program. The department is not required to administer this program unless the legislature appropriates sufficient funds for the program. The department may administer the program subject to any limitations the department considers necessary or appropriate in the absence of the legislature appropriating funds for the program.

    

    

History: 2023, Act 23, Eff. May 1, 2023

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1938–1970 · leading case: People v. Piasecki, 52 N.W.2d 626 (Mich. 1952).
People v. Piasecki, 52 N.W.2d 626 (Mich. 1952). “, as amended [Stat Ann and Stat Ann 1951 Cum Supp § 28.841 et .seg.]).”
People v. Dubina, 8 N.W.2d 99 (Mich. 1943). “§28.841 et seq.]), is unconstitutional because the subject matter is broader than the title to said Act No.”
People v. Stanley, 75 N.W.2d 39 (Mich. 1956). “, as amended (Stat Ann 1954 Rev §28.841 et seq., as amended)]). The title of said ■code of criminal procedure as applicable here, states that it is “An act to revise, consolidate and codify the laws relating to criminal procedure and to define the jurisdiction, powers, and…”
People v. Ewald, 4 N.W.2d 456 (Mich. 1942). “§28.841 et seq.~\) provide: “This act is hereby declared to be remedial in character and as such shall be liberally construed to effectuate the intents and purposes thereof.”
People v. Frontczak, 281 N.W. 534 (Mich. 1938). “§ 28.841 et seq.). Certain other chapters of the criminal code deal with subjects properly embraced therein though not relating to the trial of any person for any particular crime.”
In Re Wall, 47 N.W.2d 682 (Mich. 1951). “[Stat Ann and Stat Ann 1949 Cum Snpp § 28.841 et se p]). See specifically CL 1948, §§ 769.”
People v. Pichitino, 59 N.W.2d 100 (Mich. 1953). “(Stat Ann § 28.841 et seg.)]) the 3 methods were retained (see chapter 7, sections 1 and 2, relating to informations, sections 3 to 6, to 1-man grand juries, and sections 7 to 23, to 23-man grand juries).”
People v. Seeley, 180 N.W.2d 333 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970). “(Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.841 et seq.) which, they contend, reduced the jurisdiction of the recorder’s court by making it concurrent with that of justices of the peace in the county in certain criminal matters.”
People v. Backhaut, 20 N.W.2d 780 (Mich. 1945). “§28.841 et seq.]) (code of criminal procedure), confer upon courts of criminal jurisdiction any power to commit a criminal insane person to any State hospital except the Ionia *714 State Hospital.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.