Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.401 (2026)

Forest lands; acquisition by United States, concurrent jurisdiction.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NATIONAL AND STATE FORESTS

Act 312 of 1923

3.401 Forest lands; acquisition by United States, concurrent jurisdiction.

Sec. 1.

That the consent of the state of Michigan be and is hereby given to the acquisition by the United States, by purchase, gift, or condemnation with adequate compensation, of such lands in Michigan as in the opinion of the federal government may be needed for the establishment, consolidation and extension of national forests in the state: Provided, That the state of Michigan shall retain a concurrent jurisdiction with the United States in and over lands so acquired so far that civil process in all cases, and such criminal process as may issue under the authority of the state of Michigan against any person charged with the commission of any crime without or within said jurisdiction, may be executed thereon in like manner as if this act had not been passed.

History: 1923, Act 312, Eff. Aug. 30, 1923 ;-- CL 1929, 414 ;-- CL 1948, 3.401

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: United States v. Gabrion, 517 F.3d 839 (6th Cir. 2008).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Gabrion, 517 F.3d 839 (6th Cir. 2008). · cites it 5× “The Fourth Circuit further explained that a North Carolina state cession statute, similar to Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.401 , indicated state consent to concurrent jurisdiction and that 16 U.”

United States v. Gabrion (6th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “The Fourth Circuit further explained that a North Carolina state cession statute, similar to Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.401 , indicated state consent to concurrent jurisdiction and that 16 U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.