Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560 (2026)

Dissolution of authority; disposition of property.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

BASE CONVERSION AUTHORITY

Act 151 of 1978

3.560 Dissolution of authority; disposition of property.

Sec. 10.

Upon dissolution of an authority, the property, books, records, files, and funds of the authority shall become property of the township and shall be held or disposed of by the township in a manner prescribed by law.

History: 1978, Act 151, Imd. Eff. May 18, 1978 ;-- Am. 1991, Act 134, Imd. Eff. Nov. 6, 1991

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 78 cases, 1947–2010 · leading case: Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty. & Mun. Employees v. Dep't of Mental Health, 550 N.W.2d 190 (Mich. 1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty. & Mun. Employees v. Dep't of Mental Health, 550 N.W.2d 190 (Mich. 1996). · cites it 16× “§ 3.560(101) et seq. We hold that to the extent that they set forth departmental policy and standards concerning the care received by individuals in group homes, they constitute "rules" for purposes of the APA.”

Michigan State AFL-CIO v. Sec'y of State, 583 N.W.2d 701 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 13× “§ 3.560(101) et seq. See M.C.L. § 169.215(1)(e); M.”

Great Lakes Div. v. City of Ecorse, 576 N.W.2d 667 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “Similarly, we do not find that the Tax Tribunal's consideration of a graphic analysis requires reversal. The graphic analysis was not evidence, but merely reflected an analysis performed by the Tax Tribunal on evidence that was explained, but was not incorporated into the Tax…”

Sterling Secret Serv., Inc. v. Dep't of State Police, 174 N.W.2d 298 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 12× “110 [Stat Ann 1969 Rev §§ 3.560(21.1)-3.560(21.10)]), and to the provisions of PA 1943, No 88, as amended (MCLA §§ 24.”

Adrian Sch. Dist. v. Michigan Pub. Sch. Employees' Ret. Sys., 582 N.W.2d 767 (Mich. 1998). · cites it 3× “§ 3.560(163). We give them deference, provided they are consistent with the purpose and policies of the statute in question.”

Campbell v. Judges' Ret. Bd., 143 N.W.2d 755 (Mich. 1966). · cites it 6× “(Stat Ann 1961 Rev § 3.560[21.1] et seq. ) or RJA, PA 1961, No 236, § 631 (CLS 1961, § 600.”

Dossin's Food Prods., Inc. v. State Tax Comm'n, 103 N.W.2d 474 (Mich. 1960). · cites it 9× “108 [Stat Ann 1952 Rev § 3.560(21.8)]) provides that "any person aggrieved by a final decision in a contested *315 case" may file "a petition (for review) in the circuit court in the county wherein appellant resides or has its principal place of business in Michigan or in the…”

Superx Drugs Corp. v. State Bd. of Pharmacy, 125 N.W.2d 13 (Mich. 1963). · cites it 12× “[Stat Ann 1961 Rev § 3.560(21.1) et seq. ]). The same reflective thought proves that plaintiff in turn was right when, in brief filed October 30, 1962, it rather heatedly opposed the attorney general's motion for an order of statutory reference.”

Port Huron Educ. Ass'n v. Port Huron Area Sch. Dist., 550 N.W.2d 228 (Mich. 1996). · cites it 2× “§ 3.560(206)(1)(a), (f). Southfield Police Officers Ass'n v.”

Viculin v. Dep't of Civil Serv., 192 N.W.2d 449 (Mich. 1971). · cites it 3× “; Stat Ann 1969 Rev § 3.560[21.1] et seq.) (hereafter §- administrative procedures act.”

St Clair Intermediate Sch. Dist. v. Intermediate Educ. Ass'n/Michigan Educ. Ass'n, 581 N.W.2d 707 (Mich. 1998). · cites it 2× “§ 3.560(206)(1)(a),(f). Southfield Police Officers Ass'n v.”

Fisher-New Ctr. Co. v. State Tax Comm'n, 157 N.W.2d 271 (Mich. 1968). · cites it 4× “[Stat Ann 1961 Rev § 3.560(21.1)]). In this Court two unsuccessful attempts at persuasion are enough.”

Show all 78 citing cases →

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(101) — 10 cases

Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty. & Mun. Employees v. Dep't of Mental Health, 550 N.W.2d 190 (Mich. 1996). “§ 3.560(101) et seq. We hold that to the extent that they set forth departmental policy and standards concerning the care received by individuals in group homes, they constitute "rules" for purposes of the APA.”

Midland Cogeneration Venture Ltd. P'ship v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 501 N.W.2d 573 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993).

South MacOmb Disposal Auth. v. Am. Ins., 572 N.W.2d 686 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998).

Michigan State AFL-CIO v. Sec'y of State, 583 N.W.2d 701 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “§ 3.560(101) et seq. See M.C.L. § 169.215(1)(e); M.”

People v. Young, 559 N.W.2d 670 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(103)(6) — 1 case

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(107) — 3 cases

Park Nursing Ctr., Inc. v. Michigan Dep't of Soc. Servs. (In Re Park Nursing Ctr., Inc.), 28 B.R. 793 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1983).

Arizona Dep't of AeroNautics v. Fred Harvey Transp. Co., 561 P.2d 322 (Ariz. 1977).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(107)(j) — 1 case

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(107a)(2) — 1 case

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(108)(d) — 1 case

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(11) — 1 case

Maki v. City of East Tawas, 170 N.W.2d 530 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(124) — 1 case

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(126) — 1 case

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(141) — 1 case

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(141)(1) — 1 case

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(146)(1) — 1 case

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(148) — 1 case

Michigan State AFL-CIO v. Sec'y of State, 583 N.W.2d 701 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “§ 3.560(101) et seq. See M.C.L. § 169.215(1)(e); M.”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(148)(1) — 1 case

Michigan State AFL-CIO v. Sec'y of State, 583 N.W.2d 701 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “§ 3.560(101) et seq. See M.C.L. § 169.215(1)(e); M.”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(148)(3) — 1 case

Michigan State AFL-CIO v. Sec'y of State, 583 N.W.2d 701 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “§ 3.560(101) et seq. See M.C.L. § 169.215(1)(e); M.”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(163) — 4 cases

Michigan State AFL-CIO v. Sec'y of State, 583 N.W.2d 701 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “§ 3.560(101) et seq. See M.C.L. § 169.215(1)(e); M.”

Adrian Sch. Dist. v. Michigan Pub. Sch. Employees' Ret. Sys., 582 N.W.2d 767 (Mich. 1998). “§ 3.560(163). We give them deference, provided they are consistent with the purpose and policies of the statute in question.”

Wayne Cnty. Prosecutor v. Dep't of Corr., 548 N.W.2d 900 (Mich. 1996).

Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. Michigan, 585 N.W.2d 762 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(164) — 2 cases

Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. Michigan, 585 N.W.2d 762 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998).

Phillips v. Dukes (In Re T v. Dukes), 24 B.R. 404 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1982).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(171) — 2 cases

Great Lakes Div. v. City of Ecorse, 576 N.W.2d 667 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “Similarly, we do not find that the Tax Tribunal's consideration of a graphic analysis requires reversal. The graphic analysis was not evidence, but merely reflected an analysis performed by the Tax Tribunal on evidence that was explained, but was not incorporated into the Tax…”

Michigan State AFL-CIO v. Sec'y of State, 583 N.W.2d 701 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “§ 3.560(101) et seq. See M.C.L. § 169.215(1)(e); M.”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(177) — 1 case

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(179) — 1 case

West Bloomfield Hosp. v. Certificate of Need Bd., 567 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(182) — 2 cases

Dep't of Pub. Health v. Rivergate Manor, 550 N.W.2d 515 (Mich. 1996).

West Bloomfield Hosp. v. Certificate of Need Bd., 567 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(185) — 1 case

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(191)(2) — 1 case

Weber v. Orion Twp., 358 N.W.2d 576 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(192) — 1 case

Palo Grp. v. Dss, 577 N.W.2d 200 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(201) — 2 cases

Michigan State AFL-CIO v. Sec'y of State, 583 N.W.2d 701 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “§ 3.560(101) et seq. See M.C.L. § 169.215(1)(e); M.”

Michigan Chamber of Com. v. Land, 725 F. Supp. 2d 665 (W.D. Mich. 2010).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(202) — 1 case

People v. Young, 559 N.W.2d 670 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(204) — 1 case

State of Mich. v. City of Allen Park, 501 F. Supp. 1007 (E.D. Mich. 1980).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(206) — 2 cases

Huron Valley Hosp., Inc. v. City of Pontiac, 466 F. Supp. 1301 (E.D. Mich. 1979).

Palo Grp. v. Dss, 577 N.W.2d 200 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(206)(1)(a) — 7 cases

Port Huron Educ. Ass'n v. Port Huron Area Sch. Dist., 550 N.W.2d 228 (Mich. 1996). “§ 3.560(206)(1)(a), (f). Southfield Police Officers Ass'n v.”

St Clair Intermediate Sch. Dist. v. Intermediate Educ. Ass'n/Michigan Educ. Ass'n, 581 N.W.2d 707 (Mich. 1998). “§ 3.560(206)(1)(a),(f). Southfield Police Officers Ass'n v.”

Org. of Sch. Administrators & Supervisors v. Detroit Bd. of Educ., 580 N.W.2d 905 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998).

Grandville Mun. Exec. Ass'n v. City of Grandville, 553 N.W.2d 917 (Mich. 1996).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(206)(1)(f) — 2 cases

St Clair Intermediate Sch. Dist. v. Intermediate Educ. Ass'n/Michigan Educ. Ass'n, 581 N.W.2d 707 (Mich. 1998). “§ 3.560(206)(1)(a),(f). Southfield Police Officers Ass'n v.”

Cons. & Ind. Svcs. v. Hoffman, 583 N.W.2d 260 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(206)(d) — 1 case

Michigan State AFL-CIO v. Sec'y of State, 583 N.W.2d 701 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “§ 3.560(101) et seq. See M.C.L. § 169.215(1)(e); M.”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(207)(i) — 1 case

City of Adrian Sch. Dist. v. Pub. Sch. Employes'Ret. Sys., 556 N.W.2d 524 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(7) — 4 cases

Sterling Secret Serv., Inc. v. Dep't of State Police, 174 N.W.2d 298 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969). “110 [Stat Ann 1969 Rev §§ 3.560(21.1)-3.560(21.10)]), and to the provisions of PA 1943, No 88, as amended (MCLA §§ 24.”

People v. Wolfe, 61 N.W.2d 767 (Mich. 1953).

Lewis v. City of Grand Rapids, Michigan, 222 F. Supp. 349 (W.D. Mich. 1963).

Lane v. Dep't of Corr., Parole Bd., 165 N.W.2d 841 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.560(H) — 1 case

Maki v. City of East Tawas, 170 N.W.2d 530 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.