Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 333 / Act 368 of 1978
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.17721 (2026)

Michigan board of pharmacy; creation; membership; terms.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PUBLIC HEALTH CODE


Act 368 of 1978


333.17721 Michigan board of pharmacy; creation; membership; terms.

Sec. 17721.

    (1) The Michigan board of pharmacy is created in the department and consists of the following 11 voting members who meet the requirements of part 161:

    (a) Six pharmacists.

    (b) One pharmacy technician.

    (c) Four public members.

    (2) The terms of office of the individual members of the board created under this section, except those appointed to fill vacancies, expire 4 years after appointment on June 30 of the year in which the term expires.

History: 1978, Act 368, Eff. Sept. 30, 1978 ;-- Am. 1993, Act 79, Eff. Apr. 1, 1994 ;-- Am. 2006, Act 390, Imd. Eff. Sept. 27, 2006 ;-- Am. 2014, Act 285, Eff. Dec. 22, 2014

PopularName Notes:

Act 368
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1982–1983 · leading case: People v. Turmon, 340 N.W.2d 620 (Mich. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Turmon, 340 N.W.2d 620 (Mich. 1983). · cites it 2× “MCL 333.17721; MSA 14.15(17721), MCL 333.”
People v. O'NEAL, 333 N.W.2d 56 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “Finally, the board’s high degree of proximity to the elective process (appointment by the governor and confirmation by the senate) insures that the public is not left unprotected from uncontrolled, arbitrary power in the hands of remote administrative officials.”
People v. Turmon, 323 N.W.2d 698 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “757(2) [now MCL 333.17721; MSA 14.15(17721)] provides that the Board of Pharmacy shall consist of seven members, six of which shall be registered pharmacists licensed in the state for at least five years, actively engaged in the practice of pharmacy and graduates of a recognized…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.