PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
Act 220 of 1976
37.1201 Definitions.
Sec. 201.
As used in this article:
(a) "Employee" does not include an individual employed in domestic service of any person.
(b) "Employer" means a person who has 1 or more employees or a person who as contractor or subcontractor is furnishing material or performing work for the state or a governmental entity or agency of the state and includes an agent of such a person.
(c) "Employment agency" means a person regularly undertaking with or without compensation to procure employees for an employer or to procure for employees opportunities to work for an employer and includes an agent of such a person.
(d) "Genetic information" means information about a gene, gene product, or inherited characteristic of an individual derived from the individual's family history or a genetic test.
(e) "Genetic test" means the analysis of human DNA, RNA, chromosomes, and those proteins and metabolites used to detect heritable or somatic disease-related genotypes or karyotypes for clinical purposes. A genetic test must be generally accepted in the scientific and medical communities as being specifically determinative for the presence, absence, or mutation of a gene or chromosome in order to qualify under this definition. Genetic test does not include a routine physical examination or a routine analysis including, but not limited to, a chemical analysis of body fluids unless conducted specifically to determine the presence, absence, or mutation of a gene or chromosome.
(f) "Labor organization" includes:
(i) An organization of any kind, an agency or employee representation committee, group, association, or plan in which employees participate and which exists for the purpose, in whole or in part, of dealing with employers concerning grievances, labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours, or other terms or conditions of employment.
(ii) A conference, general committee, joint or system board, or joint council which is subordinate to a national or international labor organization.
(iii) An agent of a labor organization.
History: 1976, Act 220, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977 ;-- Am. 1990, Act 121, Imd. Eff. June 25, 1990 ;-- Am. 2000, Act 32, Imd. Eff. Mar. 15, 2000
Notes of Decisions
Lash v. City of Traverse City, 735 N.W.2d 628 (Mich. 2007).
· cites it 2× “1103(g), MCL 37.1201(b), and MCL 37.1202. [35] See the Freedom of Information Act, MCL 15.”
in Re Bradley Est., 835 N.W.2d 545 (Mich. 2013).
· cites it 2× “1103(g), MCL 37.1201(b), and MCL 37.1202 (same). Nor do we view MCL 691.”
Peden v. City of Detroit, 680 N.W.2d 857 (Mich. 2004).
· cites it 2× “1201(b) as "a person who has 1 or more employees or a person who as contractor or subcontractor is furnishing material or performing work for the state or a governmental entity or agency of the state and includes an agent of such a person." [8] Generally, an employer shall not…”
McClements v. Ford Motor Co., 702 N.W.2d 166 (Mich. 2005).
· cites it 2× “The Court in Chiles noted that the PWDCRA addresses the conduct of an "employer" who takes adverse employment action against an "individual" because of a handicap that is unrelated to the individual's ability to perform the duties of a particular job. M.C.L. § 37.1202(1)(a); M.”
Rancour v. Detroit Edison Co., 388 N.W.2d 336 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986).
· cites it 2× “” MCL 37.1201(1); MSA 3.550(201)(1). We note that subsections (f) and (g) impose an accommodation duty requiring the use of adaptive devices or aids where to do so would enable the individual to perform a particular job.”
Regan v. Faurecia Auto. Seating, Inc., 679 F.3d 475 (6th Cir. 2012).
“, and the Michigan Persons With Disabilities Civil Rights Act, Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 37.1201 -.1214, which mirrors the federal statute, Monette v.”
Wardlow v. Great Lakes Express Co., 339 N.W.2d 670 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983).
· cites it 2× “A "handicap" is: "[A] determinable physical or mental characteristic of an individual or a history of the characteristic which may result from disease, injury, congenital condition of birth, or functional disorder which characteristic: "(i) For purposes of [MCL 37.1201 et seq.;…”
Chiles v. Mach. Shop, Inc, 606 N.W.2d 398 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000).
“” MCL 37.1201(b); MSA 3.550(201)(b). The scope of the act clearly encompasses actions taken by an employer before an employment relationship even exists, e.”
Marcelle v. Taubman, 568 N.W.2d 393 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997).
· cites it 2× “MCL 37.1201(a); MSA 3.550(201)(a). Where facts are undisputed, applying a statute to the facts is an issue of law for the court.”
Marsh v. Dep't of Civil Serv., 370 N.W.2d 613 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985).
“An individual aggrieved by an employer’s violation of these acts may (1) file a complaint with the Department of Civil Rights to be heard by the commission, MCL 37.1605; MSA 3.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.1201(1) — 1 case
Rancour v. Detroit Edison Co., 388 N.W.2d 336 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986).
“” MCL 37.1201(1); MSA 3.550(201)(1). We note that subsections (f) and (g) impose an accommodation duty requiring the use of adaptive devices or aids where to do so would enable the individual to perform a particular job.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.1201(1)(b) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.1201(1)(c) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.1201(1)(g) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.1201(2) — 1 case
Rancour v. Detroit Edison Co., 388 N.W.2d 336 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986).
“” MCL 37.1201(1); MSA 3.550(201)(1). We note that subsections (f) and (g) impose an accommodation duty requiring the use of adaptive devices or aids where to do so would enable the individual to perform a particular job.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.1201(a) — 1 case
Marcelle v. Taubman, 568 N.W.2d 393 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997).
“MCL 37.1201(a); MSA 3.550(201)(a). Where facts are undisputed, applying a statute to the facts is an issue of law for the court.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.1201(b) — 10 cases
Lash v. City of Traverse City, 735 N.W.2d 628 (Mich. 2007).
“1103(g), MCL 37.1201(b), and MCL 37.1202. [35] See the Freedom of Information Act, MCL 15.”
in Re Bradley Est., 835 N.W.2d 545 (Mich. 2013).
“1103(g), MCL 37.1201(b), and MCL 37.1202 (same). Nor do we view MCL 691.”
Peden v. City of Detroit, 680 N.W.2d 857 (Mich. 2004).
“1201(b) as "a person who has 1 or more employees or a person who as contractor or subcontractor is furnishing material or performing work for the state or a governmental entity or agency of the state and includes an agent of such a person." [8] Generally, an employer shall not…”
McClements v. Ford Motor Co., 702 N.W.2d 166 (Mich. 2005).
“The Court in Chiles noted that the PWDCRA addresses the conduct of an "employer" who takes adverse employment action against an "individual" because of a handicap that is unrelated to the individual's ability to perform the duties of a particular job. M.C.L. § 37.1202(1)(a); M.”
Chiles v. Mach. Shop, Inc, 606 N.W.2d 398 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000).
“” MCL 37.1201(b); MSA 3.550(201)(b). The scope of the act clearly encompasses actions taken by an employer before an employment relationship even exists, e.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.1201(d)(1)(b) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.