Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.1607 (2026)
Diminishment of rights prohibited.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
Act 220 of 1976
37.1607 Diminishment of rights prohibited.
Sec. 607.
This act shall not diminish the right of a person to seek direct and immediate legal or equitable remedies in the courts of this state.
History: Add. 1980, Act 478, Imd. Eff. Jan. 20, 1981
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2022 · leading case: Rembert v. Ryan’s Fam. Steak Houses, Inc, 596 N.W.2d 208 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999).
Rembert v. Ryan’s Fam. Steak Houses, Inc, 596 N.W.2d 208 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “§ 37.1607; M.S.A. § 3.550(607). Of course, our Legislature could have drafted these statutes to preclude predispute agreements to arbitrate civil rights employment claims, just as it may amend these statutes to preclude arbitration agreements.”
Wardlow v. Great Lakes Express Co., 339 N.W.2d 670 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “At the very least, the Legislature should indicate whether the department's position as to this issue is consistent with the legislative intention underlying the act and with the spirit and letter of recent legislation designed to reform this state's system of workers'…”
Marsh v. Dep't of Civil Serv., 370 N.W.2d 613 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “2605; MSA 3.548(601)-3.548(605), (2) bring a civil action in circuit court for appropriate injunctive relief and/or damages, MCL 37.”
Stevens v. McLouth Steel Prods. Corp., 446 N.W.2d 95 (Mich. 1989). “MCL 37.1607; MSA 3.550(607); Marsh v Civil Service Dep’t, 142 Mich App 557 ; 370 NW2d 613 (1985).”
Constantinoff v. Emma L Bixby Hosp., 314 N.W.2d 698 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “This policy is embodied in our constitution (Const 1963, art 5, § 29), in the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (MCL 37.”
Jackson v. City of Flint, 477 N.W.2d 489 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991). “The aggrieved individual may also bring a civil action in circuit court for injunctive relief, damages, or both.”
Kristopher William Robert Wilson v. Brk Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “” MCL 37.1607. Here, plaintiff’s case is not about being denied equal enjoyment of the bar because of his disability; he enjoyed an evening of drinking and pool at the -8- determining that the open and obvious danger doctrine applied to plaintiff’s allegations that defendants’…”
Kerwin v. Cmty. Action Agency (E.D. Mich. 2022). “Laws § 37.1607 ; Jackson v. City of Flint, 477 N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.