Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 4.1105 (2026)

Legislative service bureau; creation; bill drafting, research, and other services; organization; appointment of director to serve at pleasure of council; duties, qualifications, and compensation of director.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Aug. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ACT


Act 268 of 1986


4.1105 Legislative service bureau; creation; bill drafting, research, and other services; organization; appointment of director to serve at pleasure of council; duties, qualifications, and compensation of director.

Sec. 105.

    The council shall maintain bill drafting, research, and other services for the members of the legislature in a bureau to be known as the legislative service bureau which is hereby created. The bureau shall provide bill drafting, research, and other services and shall be organized into divisions as authorized by the council. The council shall appoint a director of the legislative service bureau who shall serve at the pleasure of the council. The director shall devote his or her full time to the duties of the office, shall be qualified by experience and ability to conduct the work of the office, and shall receive such compensation as fixed by the council.

History: 1986, Act 268, Imd. Eff. Dec. 19, 1986

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2007–2015 · leading case: People of Michigan v. Robert Tuttle, 870 N.W.2d 37 (Mich. 2015).
People of Michigan v. Robert Tuttle, 870 N.W.2d 37 (Mich. 2015). · cites it 2× “1103; MCL 4.1105. The council oversees the Legislative Service Bureau.”
Apsey v. Mem'l Hosp., 730 N.W.2d 695 (Mich. 2007). · cites it 2× “MCL 4.1105. It is this bureau's responsibility to compare pending bills with existing laws for the purpose of avoiding conflicts.”
People of Michigan v. Richard Lee Hartwick, No. 148444 (Mich. July 27, 2015). · cites it 2× “1103; MCL 4.1105. The council oversees the Legislative Service Bureau.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.