Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 421 / Act 1 of 1936 (Ex. Sess.)
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 421.8 (2026)

Legislative purpose; annual review of maximum weekly benefit rates; comparison of consumers' price index; determining percentage of increase or decrease; report.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Aug. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT SECURITY ACT


Act 1 of 1936 (Ex. Sess.)


421.8 Legislative purpose; annual review of maximum weekly benefit rates; comparison of consumers' price index; determining percentage of increase or decrease; report.

Sec. 8.

    A basic purpose of this act is to lighten the burden of involuntary unemployment on the unemployed worker and the worker's family. In view of this, the maximum weekly benefit rates under section 27(b) are related to the cost of the necessities of life for the various dependency classes recognized in that section. At the same time, the legislature has concluded that the maximum weekly benefit rates established in that section will finance the most favorable standard of living consistent with maintaining for unemployed individuals generally a proper incentive to seek and accept new work. To maintain this optimum relationship between maximum weekly benefit rates and the standard of living of the unemployed individual, the maximum weekly benefit rates established must be reviewed annually. The unemployment insurance agency shall annually, not later than February 28, compare the United States Consumer Price Index from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for the preceding December with the corresponding United States Consumer Price Index from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for the base month. The base month is the month of December preceding the most recent calendar year in which an adjustment of maximum weekly benefit rates is made. If in a calendar year the United States Consumer Price Index from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for the preceding December has increased or decreased as compared to the base month, the unemployment insurance agency shall determine the percentage of that increase or decrease. The unemployment insurance agency shall then multiply the maximum weekly benefit rate for each dependency class by this percentage. If the product obtained is $1.00 or more, the unemployment insurance agency shall report that fact to the governor and the legislature.

    

    

History: 1936, Ex. Sess., Act 1, Imd. Eff. Dec. 24, 1936 ;-- Am. 1941, Act 364, Imd. Eff. July 1, 1941 ;-- Am. 1947, Act 360, Imd. Eff. July 8, 1947 ;-- CL 1948, 421.8 ;-- Am. 1967, Act 254, Imd. Eff. July 10, 1967 ;-- Am. 1968, Act 338, Imd. Eff. July 19, 1968 ;-- Am. 1970, Act 14, Imd. Eff. Apr. 14, 1970 ;-- Am. 1974, Act 104, Eff. June 9, 1974 ;-- Am. 1978, Act 526, Imd. Eff. Dec. 20, 1978 ;-- Am. 1996, Act 535, Imd. Eff. Jan. 13, 1997 ;-- Am. 2024, Act 240, Eff. Apr. 2, 2025

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2021 · leading case: Stephen’s Nu-Ad, Inc v. Green, 423 N.W.2d 625 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stephen’s Nu-Ad, Inc v. Green, 423 N.W.2d 625 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). “After being fired, the only choice left to claimant regarding whether to stay at, or to leave,- his employment was of the Hobson’s variety.”
Dueweke v. Morang Drive Greenhouses, Inc., 311 N.W.2d 712 (Mich. 1981). “MCL 421.8(2); MSA 17.508(2). As originally enacted, the MESA totally disqualified an individual who was voluntarily unemployed from receiving unemployment benefits.”
Dow Chem. Co. v. Curtis, 404 N.W.2d 737 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). “502; MCL 421.8(2); MSA 17.508(2). Mesa is intended to benefit only those involuntarily unemployed.”
Stein v. Michigan Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 555 N.W.2d 502 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996). “MCL 421.8(2); MSA 17.508(2). In carrying out this purpose, the MESC, according to the act, is instructed to perform various duties.”
Leonard Wilson v. Meijer Great Lakes Ltd. P'ship, No. 349078 (Mich. Ct. App. July 1, 2021). “MCL 421.8 states, in its first sentence, “A basic purpose of this act is to lighten the burden of involuntary unemployment on the unemployed worker and his family.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 421.8(2): 4 cases
Stephen’s Nu-Ad, Inc v. Green, 423 N.W.2d 625 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). “After being fired, the only choice left to claimant regarding whether to stay at, or to leave,- his employment was of the Hobson’s variety.”
Dueweke v. Morang Drive Greenhouses, Inc., 311 N.W.2d 712 (Mich. 1981). “MCL 421.8(2); MSA 17.508(2). As originally enacted, the MESA totally disqualified an individual who was voluntarily unemployed from receiving unemployment benefits.”
Dow Chem. Co. v. Curtis, 404 N.W.2d 737 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). “502; MCL 421.8(2); MSA 17.508(2). Mesa is intended to benefit only those involuntarily unemployed.”
Stein v. Michigan Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 555 N.W.2d 502 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996). “MCL 421.8(2); MSA 17.508(2). In carrying out this purpose, the MESC, according to the act, is instructed to perform various duties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.