LAWFUL INTERNET GAMING ACT
Act 152 of 2019
432.305 Michigan gaming control board; powers and duties; jurisdiction; agreements for multijurisdictional internet gaming for poker.
Sec. 5.
(1) The board has the powers and duties specified in this act and all other powers necessary to enable it to fully and effectively execute this act to administer, regulate, and enforce the system of internet gaming established under this act.
(2) The board has jurisdiction over every person licensed by the board and may take enforcement action against a person that is not licensed by the board that offers internet gaming in this state.
(3) The board may enter into agreements with other jurisdictions, including Indian tribes, to facilitate, administer, and regulate multijurisdictional internet gaming for poker by internet gaming operators to the extent that entering into the agreement is consistent with state and federal laws and if the internet gaming under the agreement is conducted only in the United States.
History: 2019, Act 152, Imd. Eff. Dec. 20, 2019 ;-- Am. 2020, Act 327, Eff. Mar. 24, 2021
Notes of Decisions
Jacqueline Davis v. Betmgm LLC, No. 166281 (Mich. July 22, 2025).
· cites it 4× “Relevant to this inquiry, MCL 432.305(1) assigns to the MGCB specific powers and duties defined by the act “and all other powers necessary to enable [the MGCB] to fully and effectively execute [the LIGA] to administer, regulate, and enforce the system of internet gaming…”
Jacqueline Davis v. Betmgm LLC, 19 N.W.3d 138 (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
· cites it 2× “” MCL 432.305(1). The MGCB “has jurisdiction over every person licensed by the board and may take enforcement action against a person that is not licensed by the board that offers internet gaming in this state.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 432.305(1): 2 cases
Jacqueline Davis v. Betmgm LLC, No. 166281 (Mich. July 22, 2025).
“Relevant to this inquiry, MCL 432.305(1) assigns to the MGCB specific powers and duties defined by the act “and all other powers necessary to enable [the MGCB] to fully and effectively execute [the LIGA] to administer, regulate, and enforce the system of internet gaming…”
Jacqueline Davis v. Betmgm LLC, 19 N.W.3d 138 (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
“” MCL 432.305(1). The MGCB “has jurisdiction over every person licensed by the board and may take enforcement action against a person that is not licensed by the board that offers internet gaming in this state.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 432.305(2): 1 case
Jacqueline Davis v. Betmgm LLC, 19 N.W.3d 138 (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
“” MCL 432.305(1). The MGCB “has jurisdiction over every person licensed by the board and may take enforcement action against a person that is not licensed by the board that offers internet gaming in this state.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.