Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.1528 (2026)

Pyramid.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

FRANCHISE INVESTMENT LAW


Act 269 of 1974


445.1528 Pyramid.

Sec. 28.

    The department shall not accept for filing a franchise that involves a pyramid promotional scheme that violates the pyramid promotional scheme act, MCL 445.2581 to 445.2586.

History: 1974, Act 269, Eff. Oct. 15, 1974 ;-- Am. 2018, Act 187, Eff. Sept. 11, 2018

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1985–2015 · leading case: Kerrigan v. Visalus, Inc., 112 F. Supp. 3d 580 (E.D. Mich. 2015).
Kerrigan v. Visalus, Inc., 112 F. Supp. 3d 580 (E.D. Mich. 2015). “§ 445.1528(a)(1). Under § 28, a pyramid or chain promotion includes “any plan or scheme or device by which .”
United States v. Gold Unlimited, Inc., 177 F.3d 472 (6th Cir. 1999). “17, § 2305 (West 1998); Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 445.1528 (2) (West 1998); Minn.”
People v. Cooper, 421 N.W.2d 177 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Arthur Attaway, Marvin Pittman, Delores Pittman, Yong Ja Byas and John Cooper were charged with (1) violating the pyramid promotion act, MCL 445.1528; MSA 19.854(28), (2) selling unregistered securities, MCL 451.”
Mcraild v. Shepard Lincoln Mercury, Inc, 367 N.W.2d 404 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “'Trade or commerce’ does not include franchising but does include pyramid and chain promotions as defined in section 28 of Act No.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.1528(a)(1) — 1 case
Kerrigan v. Visalus, Inc., 112 F. Supp. 3d 580 (E.D. Mich. 2015). “§ 445.1528(a)(1). Under § 28, a pyramid or chain promotion includes “any plan or scheme or device by which .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.