Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.903a (2026)

Home appliance; contents of service contract.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT


Act 331 of 1976


445.903a Home appliance; contents of service contract.

Sec. 3a.

    (1) As used in this section, "company" means a person engaged in trade or commerce who provides a service contract to consumers.

    (2) A service contract for the repair or maintenance of a home appliance shall contain the following provision:

    If performance of the service contract is interrupted because of a strike or work stoppage at the company's place of business, the effective period of the service contract shall be extended for the period of the strike or work stoppage.

History: Add. 1979, Act 150, Imd. Eff. Nov. 19, 1979

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1995–2015 · leading case: Dell v. Citizens Ins. Co. of Am., 880 N.W.2d 280 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
Dell v. Citizens Ins. Co. of Am., 880 N.W.2d 280 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “See MCL 445.903a through MCL 445.903Í. None of these provisions are relevant to this matter.”
Zine v. Chrysler Corp., 600 N.W.2d 384 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “” [MCL 445.903a(l); MSA 19.418(3a)(l)]. It would be illogical to find that the legislature’s intent was to limit the potential plaintiffs alleging unfair service contract practices to consumers (as expressly provided) while at the same time allowing anyone—consumer or not—to…”
Robertson v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 890 F. Supp. 671 (E.D. Mich. 1995). · cites it 2× “” Mich.Comp.Laws § 445.903a(l) (emphasis supplied).”
Hartman & Eichhorn Bldg. Co., Inc. v. Dailey, 701 N.W.2d 749 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “For example, MCL 445.903a defines "company" to mean "a person engaged in trade or commerce who provides a service contract to consumers.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.903a(l) — 2 cases
Zine v. Chrysler Corp., 600 N.W.2d 384 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “” [MCL 445.903a(l); MSA 19.418(3a)(l)]. It would be illogical to find that the legislature’s intent was to limit the potential plaintiffs alleging unfair service contract practices to consumers (as expressly provided) while at the same time allowing anyone—consumer or not—to…”
Robertson v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 890 F. Supp. 671 (E.D. Mich. 1995). “” Mich.Comp.Laws § 445.903a(l) (emphasis supplied).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.