Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.108 (2026)

Authorized, unauthorized insurer; definitions.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE INSURANCE CODE OF 1956


Act 218 of 1956


500.108 Authorized, unauthorized insurer; definitions.

Sec. 108.

    As used in this code:

    (1) "Authorized" insurer means an insurer duly authorized, by a subsisting certificate of authority issued by the commissioner, to transact insurance in this state.

    (2) "Unauthorized" insurer means an insurer not so authorized to transact insurance in this state.

History: 1956, Act 218, Eff. Jan. 1, 1957

PopularName Notes:

Act 218

PopularName Notes:

Essential Insurance
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1978–1983 · leading case: Allen v. Mich. Prop. & Cas. Guar. Ass'n, 341 N.W.2d 500 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983).
Allen v. Mich. Prop. & Cas. Guar. Ass'n, 341 N.W.2d 500 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “MCL 500.108; MSA 24.1108. Plaintiff has not contested the averments in this affidavit.”
Attorney Gen. ex rel. Ins. Comm'r v. Michigan Prop. & Cas. Guar. Ass'n, 263 N.W.2d 918 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). “17833, a provision (enacted contemporaneously with the act) which requires an appointed receiver "for any authorized insurer” to give prompt "notice of his appointment and a brief description of the contents of the property and casualty guaranty association act, if applicable”…”
Allen v. Michigan Prop. & Cas. Guar. Ass'n, 129 Mich. App. 271 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “MCL 500.108; MSA 24.1108. Plaintiff has not contested the averments in this affidavit.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.108(1) — 2 cases
Allen v. Mich. Prop. & Cas. Guar. Ass'n, 341 N.W.2d 500 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “MCL 500.108; MSA 24.1108. Plaintiff has not contested the averments in this affidavit.”
Allen v. Michigan Prop. & Cas. Guar. Ass'n, 129 Mich. App. 271 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “MCL 500.108; MSA 24.1108. Plaintiff has not contested the averments in this affidavit.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.