Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.108 (2026)
Authorized, unauthorized insurer; definitions.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
THE INSURANCE CODE OF 1956
Act 218 of 1956
500.108 Authorized, unauthorized insurer; definitions.
Sec. 108.
As used in this code:
(1) "Authorized" insurer means an insurer duly authorized, by a subsisting certificate of authority issued by the commissioner, to transact insurance in this state.
(2) "Unauthorized" insurer means an insurer not so authorized to transact insurance in this state.
History: 1956, Act 218, Eff. Jan. 1, 1957
PopularName Notes:
Act 218PopularName Notes:
Essential InsuranceNotes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1978–1983 · leading case: Allen v. Mich. Prop. & Cas. Guar. Ass'n, 341 N.W.2d 500 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983).
Allen v. Mich. Prop. & Cas. Guar. Ass'n, 341 N.W.2d 500 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “MCL 500.108; MSA 24.1108. Plaintiff has not contested the averments in this affidavit.”
Attorney Gen. ex rel. Ins. Comm'r v. Michigan Prop. & Cas. Guar. Ass'n, 263 N.W.2d 918 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). “17833, a provision (enacted contemporaneously with the act) which requires an appointed receiver "for any authorized insurer” to give prompt "notice of his appointment and a brief description of the contents of the property and casualty guaranty association act, if applicable”…”
Allen v. Michigan Prop. & Cas. Guar. Ass'n, 129 Mich. App. 271 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “MCL 500.108; MSA 24.1108. Plaintiff has not contested the averments in this affidavit.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.108(1) — 2 cases
Allen v. Mich. Prop. & Cas. Guar. Ass'n, 341 N.W.2d 500 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “MCL 500.108; MSA 24.1108. Plaintiff has not contested the averments in this affidavit.”
Allen v. Michigan Prop. & Cas. Guar. Ass'n, 129 Mich. App. 271 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “MCL 500.108; MSA 24.1108. Plaintiff has not contested the averments in this affidavit.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.