Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.3152 (2026)

Report of mental or physical examination.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE INSURANCE CODE OF 1956


Act 218 of 1956


500.3152 Report of mental or physical examination.

Sec. 3152.

    If requested by a person examined, a party causing an examination to be made shall deliver to him a copy of every written report concerning the examination rendered by an examining physician, at least 1 of which reports shall set out his findings and conclusions in detail. After such request and delivery, the party causing the examination to be made is entitled upon request to receive from the person examined every written report available to him or his representative concerning any examination relevant to the claim, previously or thereafter made, of the same mental or physical condition, and the names and addresses of physicians and medical care facilities rendering diagnoses or treatment in regard to the injury or to a relevant past injury, and shall authorize the insurer to inspect and copy records of physicians, hospitals, clinics or other medical facilities relevant to the claim. By requesting and obtaining a report of the examination so ordered or by taking the deposition of the examiner, the person examined waives any privilege he may have, in relation to the claim for benefits, regarding the testimony of every other person who has examined or may thereafter examine him in respect of the same mental or physical condition.

History: Add. 1972, Act 294, Eff. Mar. 30, 1973

PopularName Notes:

Act 218

PopularName Notes:

Essential Insurance

PopularName Notes:

No-Fault Insurance
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2022 · leading case: Muci v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 732 N.W.2d 88 (Mich. 2007).
Muci v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 732 N.W.2d 88 (Mich. 2007). · cites it 4× “Further, MCL 500.3152 requires that the report generated be made available to the insured and that any refusals to cooperate under these rules can be sanctioned by the court.”
Surgical Ctr. of Southfield, LLC d/b/a Fountain View Surgery Ctr. v. Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. (E.D. Mich. 2020). · cites it 4× “104-1, PageID.4975. Plaintiff argues that Michigan state law “supersedes the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.”
Surgical Ctr. of Southfield, LLC d/b/a Fountain View Surgery Ctr. v. Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. (E.D. Mich. 2020). · cites it 4× “104-1, PageID.4975. Plaintiff argues that Michigan state law “supersedes the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.”
Malick Gueye v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “MCL 500.3152. -8- omitted). And dismissal of a lawsuit is a potential statutory sanction for failing to attend scheduled IMEs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.