INTERSTATE INCOME WITHHOLDING ACT
Act 216 of 1985
552.674 Remedy cumulative; delay or denial of relief prohibited.
Sec. 4.
The remedy provided in this act is in addition to, and not in substitution for, any other remedy otherwise available to enforce a support order of another jurisdiction. Relief under this act shall not be denied, delayed, or otherwise affected because of the availability of other remedies, nor shall relief under any other statute be delayed or denied because of the availability of this remedy.
History: 1985, Act 216, Eff. Mar. 1, 1986
Notes of Decisions
McFarlane v. McFarlane, 566 N.W.2d 297 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997).
“[MCL 552.674; MSA 25.227(4).] 2 An obligor under the iiwa may raise only the following defenses: (a) That withholding is not proper because of a mistake of fact concerning the amount of current or overdue support or the identity of the obligor.”
Brodeur v. Brodeur, 455 N.W.2d 387 (Mich. Ct. App. 1990).
“However, § 4 of the withholding act, MCL 552.674; MSA 25.227(4), provides: The remedy provided in this act is in addition to, and not in substitution for, any other remedy otherwise available to enforce a support order of another jurisdiction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.