Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 560 / Act 288 of 1967
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 560.135 (2026)

Map and engineering requirements.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

LAND DIVISION ACT


Act 288 of 1967


560.135 Map and engineering requirements.

Sec. 135.

    The map of the subdivision, as drawn on the final plat shall comply with sections 135 to 141. It shall contain sufficient information to completely define, for the purpose of a resurvey, the location of any boundary, corner or angle point within the plat. All land lying within the boundaries of the plat shall be shown thereon in such a manner that title to the area may be clearly established as to whether dedicated to public use or reserved to private use.

History: 1967, Act 288, Eff. Jan. 1, 1968

PopularName Notes:

Plat Act

PopularName Notes:

Subdivision Control
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2007–2011 · leading case: Beach v. Lima Twp., 802 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Beach v. Lima Twp., 802 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. 2011). · cites it 3× “] Thus, if an adverse possessor merely sought in an adverse-possession action to be substituted for an owner of a parcel of platted property without affecting the plat’s boundary lines, which are to be shown on the plat “in such a manner that title to the area may be clearly…”
Tomecek v. Bavas, 740 N.W.2d 323 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 5× “First, the requirements of MCL 560.135 through 560.141 ensure that the map of the subdivision filed with the final plat accurately reflects the division of the property in the parcel.”
Tomecek v. Bavas, 740 N.W.2d 323 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 5× “First, the requirements of MCL 560.135 through 560.141 ensure that the map of the subdivision filed with the final plat accurately reflects the division of the property in the parcel.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.