Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 565 / R.S. of 1846
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 565.24a (2026)

Assignment of liber and page or unique identifying number; satisfaction of recording requirements; delivery of instrument rejected on prior occasion.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked July 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Revised Statutes of 1846


R.S. of 1846


565.24a Assignment of liber and page or unique identifying number; satisfaction of recording requirements; delivery of instrument rejected on prior occasion.

Sec. 24a.

    (1) The register's assignment of a liber and page or other unique identifying number is prima facie evidence that the instrument has satisfied all recording requirements, including the payment of fees, and has been accepted for recording.

    (2) An instrument is deemed to be recorded at the date and time of delivery to the register if the instrument is later determined to have satisfied all recording requirements, including the payment of fees.

    (3) When an instrument that was rejected on a prior occasion is delivered, a new delivery date and time shall be noted on the face of the instrument as required by section 24 of this chapter, and the later date and time shall be rebuttably presumed to be the date and time of delivery.

History: Add. 2008, Act 357, Imd. Eff. Dec. 23, 2008

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2026–2026 · leading case: Great Day Real Est. LLC v. Asjj Hotel Mgmt. Inc, No. 369575 (Mich. Ct. App. Mar. 13, 2026).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Great Day Real Est. LLC v. Asjj Hotel Mgmt. Inc, No. 369575 (Mich. Ct. App. Mar. 13, 2026). “See MCL 565.24a(2). We therefore offer no opinion on whether this argument has merit, and nothing in this opinion should be construed as opining on that issue.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 565.24a(2): 1 case
Great Day Real Est. LLC v. Asjj Hotel Mgmt. Inc, No. 369575 (Mich. Ct. App. Mar. 13, 2026). “See MCL 565.24a(2). We therefore offer no opinion on whether this argument has merit, and nothing in this opinion should be construed as opining on that issue.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.