Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 570 / Act 497 of 1980
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 570.1301 (2026)

Repealed. 2018, Act 367, Imd. Eff. Dec. 12, 2018.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Aug. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

CONSTRUCTION LIEN ACT


Act 497 of 1980


570.1301 Repealed. 2018, Act 367, Imd. Eff. Dec. 12, 2018.

    Repealed. 2018, Act 367, Imd. Eff. Dec. 12, 2018.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed section pertained to laws governing rights to construction liens.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1984–2013 · leading case: C D Barnes Assocs. Inc. v. Star Heaven, LLC, 834 N.W.2d 878 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
C D Barnes Assocs. Inc. v. Star Heaven, LLC, 834 N.W.2d 878 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). “MCL 570.1301(1) and (3). Section 107 of the Construction Lien Act provides in relevant part: (1) Each contractor, subcontractor, supplier, or laborer who provides an improvement to real property has a construction lien upon the interest of the owner or lessee who contracted for…”
Ruggeri Elec. Contracting Co. v. City of Algonac, 492 N.W.2d 469 (Mich. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 2× “MCL 570.1301(4); MSA 26.316(301)(4). The court then granted defendant’s motion because the suit was time-barred under the controlling mechanics’ lien act (MCL 570.”
Oerther Bros. Excavating v. Woodcraft Square Ltd. Dividend Hous. Ass'n, 355 N.W.2d 681 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 3× “Appellants contend that Woodcraft was a contracting owner *817 as that term is used in MCL 570.1301(3), (4); MSA 26.316(301)(3), (4).”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 570.1301(1): 1 case
C D Barnes Assocs. Inc. v. Star Heaven, LLC, 834 N.W.2d 878 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). “MCL 570.1301(1) and (3). Section 107 of the Construction Lien Act provides in relevant part: (1) Each contractor, subcontractor, supplier, or laborer who provides an improvement to real property has a construction lien upon the interest of the owner or lessee who contracted for…”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 570.1301(3): 1 case
Oerther Bros. Excavating v. Woodcraft Square Ltd. Dividend Hous. Ass'n, 355 N.W.2d 681 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). “Appellants contend that Woodcraft was a contracting owner *817 as that term is used in MCL 570.1301(3), (4); MSA 26.316(301)(3), (4).”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 570.1301(4): 1 case
Ruggeri Elec. Contracting Co. v. City of Algonac, 492 N.W.2d 469 (Mich. Ct. App. 1992). “MCL 570.1301(4); MSA 26.316(301)(4). The court then granted defendant’s motion because the suit was time-barred under the controlling mechanics’ lien act (MCL 570.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.