Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 6 / Act 62 of 1872
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.8 (2026)

Impeachment; acquittal.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

IMPEACHMENTS


Act 62 of 1872


6.8 Impeachment; acquittal.

Sec. 8.

    If 2/3 of all the members elected to the senate shall not assent to a conviction, the person impeached shall be declared acquitted.

History: 1872, Act 62, Imd. Eff. Mar. 30, 1872 ;-- How. 57 ;-- CL 1897, 25 ;-- CL 1915, 39 ;-- CL 1929, 66 ;-- CL 1948, 6.8

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1979–2023 · leading case: Nedrow v. MacFarlane & Hays Co. Employees' Profit Sharing Plan & Trust, 476 F. Supp. 934 (E.D. Mich. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nedrow v. MacFarlane & Hays Co. Employees' Profit Sharing Plan & Trust, 476 F. Supp. 934 (E.D. Mich. 1979). · cites it 12× “Section 6.8 of the plan, the so-called “bad boy” clause, provides: 6.”
Soupal v. Shady View, Inc, 672 N.W.2d 171 (Mich. 2003). · cites it 2× “Article VI, part A, § 6.8, "Parking Storage," provides that "[t]he owner or owners of boats may park or store such boats on his or their property providing that said property is zoned for residential use and occupied by residential dwellings.”
In Re Dow Corning Corp., 255 B.R. 445 (E.D. Mich. 2000). · cites it 2× “The Proponents also argue that section 6.8 of the Amended Joint Plan will equally apply to all allowed Class 15 claims to the extent that the claims purport to include notification, determination, and resolution of the rights requested by the United States.”
Brintley v. St. Mary Mercy Hosp., 904 F. Supp. 2d 699 (E.D. Mich. 2012). · cites it 3× “7, and those who are “Contractual Physicians,” i.”
In Re Dow Corning Corp., 244 B.R. 705 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999). “” Plan § 6.8. The Cutoff Provision then provides that "[the Debtor] will seek, as part of the Confirmation Order or pursuant to an adversary proceeding to be heard concurrently with confirmation, a determination that any such right to recover against the Settlement Facility…”
In Re Dow Corning Corp., 244 B.R. 634 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999). “Plan § 6.8. The cut-off provision states that certain Class 15 claimants have asserted a right to recover from the Settlement Facility if the facility pays the allowed claim of a settling breast-implant claimant without providing notice to or an adjudication of the rights of a…”
In re Spiech Farms, LLC, 592 B.R. 152 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2018). “at § 6.8). It is hard to imagine an agreement being any clearer regarding the risk of loss than this provision.”
Open Stores in Keego Harbor Comm. v. City of Keego Harbor (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 13× “In a letter dated August 2, 2023, the City’s attorney informed plaintiff that its petition was rejected because plaintiff failed to comply with Keego Harbor City Charter § 6.8, which required that all petitions be approved by the City Clerk before being circulated for signatures.”
In Re Iron Workers Local 25 Pension Fund, 811 F. Supp. 2d 1295 (E.D. Mich. 2011). “Trust Agreement § 6.8. 13. Actions or decisions of the Joint Board must be made by a majority of the votes cast by the trustees attending a meeting and all meetings must be “conducted in accordance with Robert’s Rules of Order, Newly Revised, unless waived by the Trustees…”
HUGHES v. Wayne, City of (E.D. Mich. 2022). · cites it 6× “Section 6.8(a)– 1 Because the Court must view all facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, see Bassett v.”
Dearborn City Council v. Mayor of Dearborn, 387 N.W.2d 633 (Mich. 1986). · cites it 4× “Change in Compensation: Section 6.8. The compensation for appointive offices shall not be increased or decreased during the term of office to which each officer was appointed.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.8(a) — 1 case
HUGHES v. Wayne, City of (E.D. Mich. 2022). “Section 6.8(a)– 1 Because the Court must view all facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, see Bassett v.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.8(b) — 1 case
HUGHES v. Wayne, City of (E.D. Mich. 2022). “Section 6.8(a)– 1 Because the Court must view all facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, see Bassett v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.