Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 600 / Act 236 of 1961
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5040 (2026)

Repealed. 1993, Act 78, Eff. Apr. 1, 1994.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961


Act 236 of 1961


600.5040 Repealed. 1993, Act 78, Eff. Apr. 1, 1994.

    Repealed. 1993, Act 78, Eff. Apr. 1, 1994.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 70 cases, 1979–2005 · leading case: Morris v. Metriyakool, 344 N.W.2d 736 (Mich. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Morris v. Metriyakool, 344 N.W.2d 736 (Mich. 1984). · cites it 10× “The most significant issue presented is whether the malpractice arbitration act of 1975, MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq.”
Rory v. Cont'l Ins., 703 N.W.2d 23 (Mich. 2005). · cites it 2× “[61] Former MCL 600.5040 et seq. [62] Id. at 440 , 344 N.”
Morris v. Metriyakool, 309 N.W.2d 910 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 6× “The Michigan arbitration statute, MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq.”
Brown v. Siang, 309 N.W.2d 575 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 6× “Hood-McNeely-Geake Malpractice Arbitration Act of 1975, MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq.”
McKinstry v. Valley Obstetrics-Gynecology Clinic, PC, 405 N.W.2d 88 (Mich. 1987). · cites it 4× “The principal issue is usually posed in terms of who must bear the "burden of proof" in establishing the validity (or invalidity) of an arbitration agreement signed pursuant to the Medical Malpractice Arbitration Act, MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq.”
Williams v. O'CONNOR, 310 N.W.2d 825 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 4× “Hood-McNeely-Geake Malpractice Arbitration Act (MAA), MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq.”
Ballard v. Sw. Detroit Hosp., 327 N.W.2d 370 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 4× “This appeal involves consideration of both the medical malpractice arbitration act, MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq.”
Moore v. Fragatos, 321 N.W.2d 781 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 4× “At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court ruled from the bench that the medical malpractice arbitration act, MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq.”
Rome v. Sinai Hosp. of Detroit, 316 N.W.2d 428 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 4× “Nor is the act unconscionable in that it abrogates plaintiff's constitutional right of access to the courts.”
Nielsen v. Barnett, 485 N.W.2d 666 (Mich. 1992). · cites it 4× “" The parties' arbitration agreement is governed by the Malpractice Arbitration Act (MAA), MCL 600.5040 et seq. ; MSA 27A.5040 et seq.”
Gale v. Providence Hosp., 325 N.W.2d 439 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 4× “MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq.”
Campbell v. St John Hosp., 455 N.W.2d 695 (Mich. 1990). · cites it 2× “Defendants contend, however, that §5044(2) of the Malpractice Arbitration Act, MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq.”
Show all 70 citing cases →
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5040(1) — 9 cases
Morris v. Metriyakool, 344 N.W.2d 736 (Mich. 1984). “The most significant issue presented is whether the malpractice arbitration act of 1975, MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq.”
Ballard v. Sw. Detroit Hosp., 327 N.W.2d 370 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). “This appeal involves consideration of both the medical malpractice arbitration act, MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq.”
Nielsen v. Barnett, 485 N.W.2d 666 (Mich. 1992). “" The parties' arbitration agreement is governed by the Malpractice Arbitration Act (MAA), MCL 600.5040 et seq. ; MSA 27A.5040 et seq.”
Horn v. Cooke, 325 N.W.2d 558 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982).
Nemzin v. Sinai Hosp., 372 N.W.2d 667 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5040(2)(a) — 2 cases
Morris v. Metriyakool, 309 N.W.2d 910 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “The Michigan arbitration statute, MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq.”
Cox v. D'Addario, 570 N.W.2d 284 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5040(2)(b) — 3 cases
Brown v. Siang, 309 N.W.2d 575 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “Hood-McNeely-Geake Malpractice Arbitration Act of 1975, MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq.”
Marciniak v. Amid, 412 N.W.2d 248 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987).
Kukowski v. Piskin, 327 N.W.2d 832 (Mich. 1982).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5040(2)(c) — 1 case
Brown v. Siang, 309 N.W.2d 575 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “Hood-McNeely-Geake Malpractice Arbitration Act of 1975, MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.